Scuderia Fans

  • News
  • Current Drivers
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Lewis Hamilton
  • Races
    • 2026 F1 Hungarian Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Dutch Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Italian Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Spanish Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Azerbaijan Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Bahrain Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Singapore Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 United States Grand Prix
  • Formula 1 Statistics
  • Ferrari F1 World Champions
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Kimi Raikkonen
    • Niki Lauda
    • Jody Scheckter
    • John Surtees
    • Phil Hill
    • Mike Hawthorn
    • Juan-Manuel Fangio
    • Alberto Ascari
  • Former Ferrari drivers
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Felipe Massa
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Gilles Villeneuve
    • Jean Alesi
    • Alain Prost
    • Nigel Mansell
    • Gerhard Berger
    • Mario Andretti
    • Rubens Barrichello
    • Michele Alboreto
    • Patrick Tambay
    • Eddie Irvine
    • Rene Arnoux
    • Didier Pironi
    • Jacky Ickx
    • Carlos Reutemann
    • Clay Regazzoni
    • Stefan Johansson
    • Arturo Merzario
    • Giancarlo Fisichella
    • Carlos Sainz
  • Ferrari WEC
  • F1 TICKETS
  • Advertise with ScuderiaFans
  • Ferrari F1 Shop
  • Home
  • Formula 1 Schedule & Results
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
  • Contact us
Home » Why Technical Directive (TD039) is not main cause of Ferrari’s shocking decline

Why Technical Directive (TD039) is not main cause of Ferrari’s shocking decline. TD039 is not main cause of Ferrari's shocking decline.

There are still four Grands Prix to go until the end of the 2022 Formula 1 season but its outcome has already been decided in favor of Max Verstappen and Red Bull.

A result that is hardly surprising judging by the ability of the Dutch driver and the Austrian team to perfectly execute race weekends, unlike their rivals, mainly Scuderia Ferrari. What is most striking, however, is the huge gap in the standings, considering that the Maranello team had built a fast car.

However, its competitiveness was lost after the summer break and, although public opinion has “blamed” the Technical Directive TD039, Mattia Binotto himself denied the hypothesis.

The first outings on track during the pre-season testing session and the first GPs had indicated a championship marked by the contest for the title between Red Bull and Ferrari, but a duel that eventually did not take place, as Ferrari lost valuable points midway through the year, before falling behind also in terms of race pace. But what is the reason for the Ferrari performance loss?

Add ScuderiaFans.com as your preferred Google News source for Formula 1 updates

Show your support for Scuderia Ferrari with official merchandise collection! Click here to enter the F1 online Store and shop securely! And also get your F1 tickets for every race with VIP hospitality and unparalleled insider access. Click here for the best offers to support Charles and Carlos from the track!

Many have railed against the Technical Directive TD039, which would have played a fundamental role in the separation between the two teams. The technical directives were created to support the FIA ​​in controlling the direction taken by the technical development of the single-seaters, thus managing the gray areas of the regulations.

The TD039 is the so-called “antiporpoising”. Especially in the early part of the season, in fact, due to the new floor rules, the F1 cars began to suffer from sometimes unmanageable vertical oscillations. See Mercedes in Baku. In this regard, already from Canada, the FIA ​​should have made the directive known to try to fix the problem in a fair way for all the teams.

Ferrari F1 merchandise

The proposals and the concerns of the teams, however, delayed the official introduction which arrived in the Belgian GP, ​​when the beginning of the difficulties of the Maranello team was traced back. But is it really so?

The answer to the question is “no”, at least according to Mattia Binotto. The Ferrari team principal, in fact, stated that TD039 did not influence the drop in performance of the F1-75, as it had already begun at the Budapest GP.

“Even if there have been some obvious interventions that have affected the floors of the cars following the new technical regulations, I am sure that these have not affected the performance of our car. It is not the TD039 that has caused our problems. We already realized in Budapest that something was wrong, a month before the race at the Spa Francorchamps circuit.” – said the team principal.

Martia Binotto then explained what the cause was: a greater ability from Red Bull to design and develop its own car.

“I think we have been penalized by the impressive and fast development with which Red Bull has improved the RB18. We weren’t as good as they were at perfecting the car’s potential,” the manager finally admitted. “This can be clearly understood by looking at the rest of the car as well. Even though the gap at the beginning of the year was quite high, Mercedes managed to make up for the disadvantage, while we remained more or less at the same level. ” – the Ferrari boss explained.

Red Bull therefore won the development battle against Ferrari. On the occasion of the Emilia Romagna GP, in fact, the Milton Keynes team brought the first real package of updates, consisting of lighter parts of the car. These made the RB18 more agile, allowing it to correct its understeer nature and thus giving a faster car to an unbeatable Max Verstappen.

However, behind this leap forward, there is a better study of the car, which can be traced back to many years ago. In fact, we must not forget who designed it: that genius of Adrian Newey. The engineer had already designed a car without the porpoising issue some time, a car capable of handling the ground effect in total fluency.

Over the course of the season, again, the Milton Keynes team was able to partially replicate that rake set-up that has given great satisfaction in the past. All without “switching on” the aerodynamic bouncing with the result of obtaining increased performance.

Red Bull, consequently, is already by its very nature a car designed not to suffer from vertical oscillations and therefore, while everyone else was going crazy to interpret the TD039 using their energies to fight porposing, the team from Milton Keynes was able to concentrate on winning the F1 double world championship, thinking about how to improve the car. Newey once again proved to be one step ahead of his competitors.

Red Bull and Ferrari suspect that Mercedes is behind the FIA's technical  directive on porpoising
Oct 15, 2022Scuderia Fans
Click here to set ScuderiaFans.com as your preferred Google Discover source and find our content more easily!
Charles Leclerc outlines improvements needed for Ferrari to deny Max Verstappen title in 2023Ferrari driver Carlos Sainz reveals his goal for 2023 Formula 1 season

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Scuderia Fans
4 years ago News2022 Formula 1 season, Scuderia Ferrari1,178
Next F1 race
0 Days
00 Hours
00 Mins
00 Secs
RACE DAY
until lights out
Gear up with Ferrari merchandise!
Buy official Ferrari 2026 F1 products
2026 Formula 1 calendar

Complete 2026 Formula 1 calendar with all Grand Prix dates and locations

Latest Ferrari technical analysis
Ferrari SF-26, suspension, brake discs, garage, 2026 F1, mechanics
Ferrari finds promising SF-26 improvements at Austin ahead of 2027 F1 development
19 hours ago
Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari SF-26, garage, 2026 F1, pitlane
Ferrari SF-26 Austin upgrades analysed: how much performance has the new package added?
23 hours ago
Ferrari SF-26, suspension, garage, 2026 F1
Ferrari SF-26 Austin upgrades explained: four key aerodynamic changes for US GP
1 day ago
Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-26, 2026 F1
Ferrari’s United States GP SF-26 upgrades could provide key lessons for 2027
1 day ago
Ferrari SF-26, wet, 2026 F1
Ferrari SF-26 slow-corner weakness: how Austin upgrades could help
2 days ago

Latest articles

  • Why is the Austin F1 circuit so bumpy? The hidden ground problem at COTA
  • Ferrari’s Austin Q3 mystery: Charles Leclerc blames tyres, Lewis Hamilton points to engine deficit
  • Lewis Hamilton jokes about his age as F1 drivers criticise Austin track bumps
  • US GP telemetry: Charles Leclerc had front-row pace before Q3 problems
  • Why Ferrari keeps losing performance between practice and qualifying in F1 2026
Partners
Betwinner

non-GamStop casinos

best online casinos not on GamStop

bwacademy

magyarkaszinooldalak

GP-News - latest F1 news updates

The most accurate sports predictions and latest news available on TipsGG

1Win

no deposit casinos at GHZD Betpack Mostbet Pakistan australiacasinopokies top canadian casinos

Formula 1 News

Guitar Junky

Best Intraday Tips

Contact Center Company

SilverArrows.Net - Mercedes F1 news

TopSpeed

Esports Forum

Racing Statistics

Fixture Calendar

Live F1 Results

You can find reel-based games without download or registration via free slots on Slotozilla

Uusia Nettikasinoita
Thailand Walking Street

de bedste odds uden ROFUS på Leadership.ng

Get In Touch With Us

  • Advertise with ScuderiaFans
  • Contact us
  • Corrections Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Support ScuderiaFans.com

Meet the team

  • About us
  • Our writers
  • Formula 1 Circuits
  • 2026 Formula 1 Calendar
  • Formula 1 Statistics & Analysis
  • Ferrari F1 FAQ

© 2016–2026 Scuderia Fans Ltd. All rights reserved.

Scuderia Fans Ltd.
199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392
2016 © Scuderia Fans