Scuderia Fans

  • News
  • Current Drivers
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Lewis Hamilton
  • Races
    • 2026 F1 Hungarian Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Dutch Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Italian Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Spanish Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Azerbaijan Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Bahrain Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Singapore Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 United States Grand Prix
  • Formula 1 Statistics
  • Ferrari F1 World Champions
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Kimi Raikkonen
    • Niki Lauda
    • Jody Scheckter
    • John Surtees
    • Phil Hill
    • Mike Hawthorn
    • Juan-Manuel Fangio
    • Alberto Ascari
  • Former Ferrari drivers
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Felipe Massa
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Gilles Villeneuve
    • Jean Alesi
    • Alain Prost
    • Nigel Mansell
    • Gerhard Berger
    • Mario Andretti
    • Rubens Barrichello
    • Michele Alboreto
    • Patrick Tambay
    • Eddie Irvine
    • Rene Arnoux
    • Didier Pironi
    • Jacky Ickx
    • Carlos Reutemann
    • Clay Regazzoni
    • Stefan Johansson
    • Arturo Merzario
    • Giancarlo Fisichella
    • Carlos Sainz
  • Ferrari WEC
  • F1 TICKETS
  • Advertise with ScuderiaFans
  • Ferrari F1 Shop
  • Home
  • Formula 1 Schedule & Results
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
  • Contact us
Home » Zandvoort qualifying analysis: inconsistent SF-24 handling and poor tire management for Ferrari

Zandvoort qualifying analysis: inconsistent SF-24 handling and poor tire management for Ferrari. A direct comparison between Ferrari and McLaren at Zandvoort.

Ferrari’s position in the standings is clear: Charles Leclerc is in sixth place, nearly a second off the top. However, compared to Friday, the Maranello team has made a step forward in terms of setup. The car seen on Friday had much more understeer, especially in the first corner and in the section from turn 7 to turn 10. This lack of rotation then turned into an excess, generating oversteer. Since then, the Maranello technicians have worked hard on fine-tuning, trying to give the SF-24 a solid front end, and they partially succeeded.

The Italian car handled much better in the central section, although some control issues were still visible on exit. Once the balance of the SF-24 was sorted, the handling returned to its usual state, meaning it was somewhat oversteer-prone on exit. This factor undoubtedly limited the car’s effectiveness in traction, especially between turns 9 and 10, the latter being particularly crucial as it precedes a stretch of high-speed running that leads to turn 11.

Next, we can offer a direct comparison between Ferrari and McLaren, highlighting the areas where the red car currently falls short. In the first sector, the SF-24 gains during braking, benefiting from notable stability in these phases. However, the balance in the first corner is negative, with a loss of a tenth and a half compared to the British driver’s MCL38. In the central sector, Charles Leclerc does better than Lando Norris in the entry to turn 10, but the McLaren driver takes advantage of a car with much more grip and manages to gain throughout the following straight.

Ferrari had good balance, but the level of grip was lower in all phases of cornering. In turn 10, good work was done, with the drivers today able to get closer to the inside curb, something almost impossible during FP2. Both drivers complained over the radio about the car’s total inconsistency. In other words, there was no consistency in handling, especially in turn 10. Each lap was different, as Carlos Sainz, who suffered the most between the two, pointed out. This is related to the balance but mainly to the tires, which once again proved to be an additional variable.

Add ScuderiaFans.com as your preferred Google News source for Formula 1 updates

In some areas, the compounds overheated, while in others, they were a bit too cool, creating inconsistency in this aspect as well. The only sector where they lost less was the third, where they managed to maintain a gap of a tenth from the top. The last corner was handled well, and the top speeds were good. The Mercedes and Red Bull reached 335 kilometers per hour, while the fastest of the two Ferraris was at 333 kilometers per hour.

This is a fairly small delta. From the start of the weekend, they had built a setup focused on maximizing top speed. During the third free practice session, the high-downforce wing from Monaco was tested. Perhaps only due to weather conditions, but the historic Italian team decided to bring it here to Zandvoort. However, it was never tried in dry conditions, as in terms of efficiency, it was far from the target set for the setup.

McLaren built an excellent setup, managing to find the best compromise between the three sectors. In the first sector, they gained a lot at the first corner, from the apex onward. In just those few meters, they gained a tenth over Verstappen’s Red Bull. The latter continued to lose time in the traction phase exiting turn 3, the parabolic corner. The MCL38 enjoyed good overall balance, with only slight oversteer in the middle of the corner. Nothing too evident. In fact, this slight oversteer helped to rotate the car, benefiting in the central sector, where the RB20 managed to gain, especially during entry.

Ferrari F1 merchandise

This is unusual, considering that Red Bull typically builds its advantage in the second half of the corner. Verstappen encountered some inconsistency in the handling of his car but still managed to put together a very competitive lap. Despite being hard to find, the balance was good. Red Bull managed to set a direction yesterday that was further developed today. Over four corners (7-10), the RB20 recovered about a tenth and a half from McLaren.

The Red Bull technicians’ skill lay in finding a good compromise in front-end rigidity, allowing solid entry while maintaining the advantage in traction. McLaren, on the other hand, made the difference in acceleration and on the straights, gaining on all cars in the last corner. Finally, Mercedes lost performance between Friday and Saturday, even though track temperature remained the same, around 30°C.

The Brackley team suffered various problems with the front end, which lacked grip in several parts of the track. From the start of qualifying, the German cars experienced significant understeer, especially Lewis Hamilton, who was eliminated in Q2. In turn 9, George Russell struggled to hit the inside curb during his last attempt in Q3. In turn 10, he tried to close the line, but the car responded by triggering oversteer, with the rear end losing grip. Mercedes needs to be reassessed on a track that doesn’t seem to suit the W15 too well.

Ferrari SF-24 rear view

Aug 25, 2024Maria Lombardi
Click here to set ScuderiaFans.com as your preferred Google Discover source and find our content more easily!
Zandvoort GP: Ferrari SF-24 battles with understeer, McLaren MCL38 very strong in brakingTelemetry data comparison: where Ferrari SF-24 falls short against McLaren MCL38 at Zandvoort (video)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Maria Lombardi

Maria Lombardi is a ScuderiaFans editorial byline exploring the human side of Formula 1, including driver pressure, motivation, decision-making and team relationships, with a particular focus on Ferrari.

2 years ago News2024 Formula 1 season, Dutch GP, Scuderia Ferrari168
Next F1 race
0 Days
00 Hours
00 Mins
00 Secs
RACE DAY
until lights out
Gear up with Ferrari merchandise!
Buy official Ferrari 2026 F1 products
2026 Formula 1 calendar

Complete 2026 Formula 1 calendar with all Grand Prix dates and locations

Latest Ferrari technical analysis
Charles Leclerc, Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari 2026 F1
Ferrari’s USA GP Q3 setback explained: how changing wind exposed the SF-26’s new balance
5 hours ago
Ferrari SF-26, suspension, brake discs, garage, 2026 F1, mechanics
Ferrari finds promising SF-26 improvements at Austin ahead of 2027 F1 development
1 day ago
Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari SF-26, garage, 2026 F1, pitlane
Ferrari SF-26 Austin upgrades analysed: how much performance has the new package added?
1 day ago
Ferrari SF-26, suspension, garage, 2026 F1
Ferrari SF-26 Austin upgrades explained: four key aerodynamic changes for US GP
2 days ago
Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-26, 2026 F1
Ferrari’s United States GP SF-26 upgrades could provide key lessons for 2027
2 days ago

Latest articles

  • Lewis Hamilton identifies key Ferrari setup issue after missing F1 USA GP podium
  • Fred Vasseur reveals what Ferrari lacked in Austin despite Charles Leclerc podium
  • Charles Leclerc reveals battery problem after daring Max Verstappen overtake in Austin
  • Ferrari fights back in Austin as Charles Leclerc takes P2 and Lewis Hamilton P4
  • Kimi Antonelli wins F1 USA GP as Charles Leclerc beats Max Verstappen to second
Partners
Betwinner

non-GamStop casinos

best online casinos not on GamStop

bwacademy

magyarkaszinooldalak

GP-News - latest F1 news updates

The most accurate sports predictions and latest news available on TipsGG

1Win

no deposit casinos at GHZD Betpack Mostbet Pakistan australiacasinopokies top canadian casinos

Formula 1 News

Guitar Junky

Best Intraday Tips

Contact Center Company

SilverArrows.Net - Mercedes F1 news

TopSpeed

Esports Forum

Racing Statistics

Fixture Calendar

Live F1 Results

You can find reel-based games without download or registration via free slots on Slotozilla

Uusia Nettikasinoita
Thailand Walking Street

de bedste odds uden ROFUS på Leadership.ng

Get In Touch With Us

  • Advertise with ScuderiaFans
  • Contact us
  • Corrections Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Support ScuderiaFans.com

Meet the team

  • About us
  • Our writers
  • Formula 1 Circuits
  • 2026 Formula 1 Calendar
  • Formula 1 Statistics & Analysis
  • Ferrari F1 FAQ

© 2016–2026 Scuderia Fans Ltd. All rights reserved.

Scuderia Fans Ltd.
199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392
2016 © Scuderia Fans