Ferrari leave Madrid without a podium for the fourth consecutive Grand Prix, even though Charles Leclerc’s race pace told a much more encouraging story. The Monegasque completed a remarkable 48-lap stint on the Hard tyres at a fast and consistent pace before finishing fourth, once again highlighting the central limitation of the SF-26: its podium potential is emerging on Sunday, but Ferrari is not putting itself in the right position to exploit it on Saturday.
There is one Ferrari that has now gone four races without reaching the podium, and another that looks capable of doing so when placed in ideal circumstances. Reality always wins, however, and the Scuderia heads back from Madrid to Maranello having once again missed the top three. Charles Leclerc’s pace for a large part of the 2026 Spanish Grand Prix at Madring was both quick and consistent, but that alone was not enough to produce a major result. In practice, a Formula 1 weekend starts on Saturday afternoon with qualifying, and without a strong grid position the race immediately becomes an uphill battle.
Ferrari splits its Madrid strategy before Lewis Hamilton’s brake problem
At Madring, that climb proved particularly steep because opportunities to overtake on track were effectively non-existent. That was why Ferrari decided to split its strategies, with Lewis Hamilton starting on a set of Soft tyres while Charles Leclerc began the race on Hards.
Lewis Hamilton’s race was effectively compromised within the opening corners as he began dealing with an abnormal increase in brake-pedal travel. Ferrari gave him instructions from the pit wall in an attempt to resolve the issue and, for a few corners, the situation appeared to improve. The problem then returned, bringing his hopes to an end. Further details subsequently emerged surrounding Lewis Hamilton’s Madrid brake failure.
Charles Leclerc’s 48-lap hard-tyre stint shows Ferrari’s Madrid race pace
Things went much better for Charles Leclerc. His race was of an extremely high standard, with the Ferrari driver completing a 48-lap stint on the Hard tyres without putting a foot wrong. It was during this phase that one of the SF-26’s strongest qualities emerged: its ability to treat the tyres extremely gently and keep them clear of the graining that had been feared before the race.
The longevity of the Hard compound became one of the defining elements of Ferrari’s strategy, and the complete tyre picture can also be explored through the ScuderiaFans F1 Tyre & Stint Analysis. Once Charles Leclerc eventually made his pit stop, however, Ferrari was brought back to reality. With the current package, reaching the podium has become difficult.
“We knew there was a reasonable chance of a Safety Car or a red flag,” Frederic Vasseur commented. “So we decided to extend the stint to keep that opportunity open. A race suspension could have put us in a position to fight for the win, while a Safety Car could have given us the chance to aim for third place. In the end, neither situation happened, but I absolutely believe it was worth trying.”
Fourth place was nevertheless the maximum result realistically available without outside assistance. Charles Leclerc himself confirmed that after the race, supporting the decision taken by Ferrari’s pit wall.
“We did a good job with the strategy, playing our cards: we decided to take a risk and wait for a Safety Car before the end of the race to try to take advantage of it, but that possibility did not materialise. If we had chosen the opposite strategy, I would still have finished fourth, so I think we got the maximum possible from our race.”
Ferrari’s podium hopes were compromised by qualifying
That is precisely the issue. Charles Leclerc produced an almost flawless race and showed a level of pace that, at several stages, would have allowed him to fight for a podium position. But Madring magnified the importance of qualifying. When overtaking becomes almost impossible, starting fifth means having to rely on strategy or unexpected events to transform the race.
Ferrari chose to take that chance, extending the opening stint as far as possible, but without the Safety Car or red flag it needed, the price of fifth place on the grid became impossible to overturn. It was the continuation of a problem already visible in Ferrari’s Spanish GP qualifying performance, when the SF-26 was competitive but failed to maximise its potential on the decisive final runs.
It is also becoming a recurring pattern. The Ferrari seen on Sundays continues to look better than its starting position suggests, something Frederic Vasseur did not attempt to hide.
“If we were missing something, it was mainly yesterday,” Frederic Vasseur admitted. “Today I think we did what we had to do, we took the risks we had to take. Charles’s pace was more than good, he completed a very long stint on the Hards and at the end the pace was still there.”
Frederic Vasseur identifies Ferrari’s qualifying weakness
The focus therefore inevitably shifts back to Saturday. Frederic Vasseur pointed out that the competitive picture changed several times during qualifying before the final verdict arrived with the last attempt in Q3.
“If we look at the four qualifying runs, at one point Max was in front, then Norris, then Kimi and then Lewis. But we finished the most important one behind them. We have to improve because, when we look at the race pace, the speed is there. We need to do a better job in qualifying.”
The same limitation had already appeared at Zandvoort, and Madrid produced a very similar pattern. Frederic Vasseur, however, does not necessarily believe it is a structural characteristic of the SF-26. Instead, the Ferrari team principal identified a more specific area that needs improvement: the team’s ability to follow the evolution of the circuit and continue extracting additional performance as the qualifying session develops.
That issue became particularly important at Madring, a venue where Ferrari had reasons to expect a better competitive picture after the very different challenge of Monza. The contrast between the two circuits had already raised the possibility that the SF-26 could be stronger at Madring than at Monza, and Sunday’s race pace ultimately confirmed that Ferrari had considerably more potential than its fourth-place finish alone suggested.
“If we stop qualifying after the first attempt in Q3, the picture is different. If we put Monza aside, because its characteristics require a completely different configuration, Zandvoort and Madrid followed a fairly similar pattern for us. We had decent pace in qualifying, but on the final attempt we were unable to put everything together.
“If I had to identify one area today on which the team needs to focus, I would say the evolution of our pace during qualifying rather than the qualifying pace itself. On the first attempt in Q3 we were there. The potential exists.”
Ferrari has the speed on Sunday but must unlock it earlier
According to Frederic Vasseur’s assessment, the SF-26 is reaching the decisive stage of qualifying without managing to make the same final step forward as its rivals. That is how a Ferrari capable of completing almost 50 laps on the Hard tyres on Sunday while maintaining podium-level pace finds itself starting behind the very cars it wants to fight against.
Madrid therefore confirmed Ferrari’s current contradiction. As long as the SF-26’s strongest pace continues to emerge mainly on Sunday, the Scuderia will remain dependent on aggressive strategies, Safety Cars and red flags to recover what it has already lost 24 hours earlier.
Leave a Reply