Nico Rosberg has delivered an unequivocal verdict on the clash between Ferrari team-mates Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton at the Italian Grand Prix, arguing that the incident was “100 per cent” Leclerc’s fault. The 2016 Formula 1 world champion based his assessment on Hamilton’s position as the two Ferraris fought through Monza’s opening chicane.
The incident came during a frantic start to Ferrari’s home Grand Prix, with Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton starting alongside each other on the second row. Hamilton attacked on the inside before finding himself forced towards the gravel as the two SF-26s negotiated the chicane.
Nico Rosberg says Leclerc-Hamilton Ferrari incident was straightforward
Analysing the moment for Sky Sports F1, Nico Rosberg said there was little ambiguity in his view of what happened. He focused specifically on Lewis Hamilton’s position relative to Charles Leclerc as they approached the apex and began turning into the corner.
“That’s an easy one, because the rules are, if the driver on the outside, which in this case is Lewis, is ahead at some point towards the apex or during turn-in, the guy on the inside must leave room.
“It’s very straightforward and simple. Lewis was ahead going in, so Charles has to leave room.
“And he didn’t, so it was 100 per cent Charles’ fault, and that’s it.”
Rosberg’s interpretation is therefore based not simply on the fact that Hamilton eventually ran out of road, but on where the Ferrari drivers were positioned as the corner developed. In his assessment, Hamilton had established enough overlap on the outside for Leclerc to be required to leave sufficient space.
Hamilton’s position was the decisive detail for Rosberg
That distinction is important because wheel-to-wheel incidents are not judged solely by which driver begins a corner on the inside. The relative position of the two cars during turn-in and towards the apex can be central to determining how much racing room each driver is expected to provide.
For Rosberg, the critical point was clear: Hamilton was ahead as the two Ferraris went into the corner. From that moment, he believed Leclerc could not simply use the full width of the circuit and leave his team-mate without room on the outside.
The assessment also carries an interesting dimension given Rosberg’s extensive experience racing Hamilton at close quarters. The pair spent several seasons fighting as Mercedes team-mates, including numerous intense wheel-to-wheel battles during their championship rivalry.
Ferrari’s promising Monza start quickly became complicated
The incident was particularly costly in the context of Ferrari’s starting position. Oscar Piastri’s qualifying penalty had promoted Charles Leclerc to third and Lewis Hamilton to fourth on the grid, giving the Scuderia two cars directly behind the front row and a strong platform from which to attack at its home race. Formula 1’s official grid confirmed Leclerc and Hamilton in third and fourth respectively.
Instead, the two Ferrari drivers immediately found themselves fighting one another. Rosberg’s verdict does not represent an official stewarding judgment on responsibility, but his explanation leaves no ambiguity about how he interpreted the incident: in his view, Hamilton had earned the right to space on the outside and Leclerc failed to provide it.
For Ferrari, that made an already dramatic opening to the Italian Grand Prix even more uncomfortable. A second-row start had offered the prospect of the two SF-26s working their way towards the front; within the opening battle, the focus had instead shifted to contact between its own drivers and a clear disagreement over who was entitled to the racing line.
Leave a Reply