
In the coming weeks, three formal meetings will take place to discuss the evolution of the 2026 Formula 1 regulations, as the sport continues to evaluate the impact of the new ruleset introduced for the next generation of cars.
The 2026 regulations have been debated since their inception, which is why this month’s meetings will focus on assessing potential improvements that could be implemented. The start of this new regulatory cycle has not been particularly well received by drivers, especially following the introduction of the new V6 power units that significantly altered the power balance, bringing it to a 50/50 split between the internal combustion engine and electric energy supplied by the battery.
With the internal combustion engine now providing only half of the total power output, the electric component must rely on constant energy recovery. This is achieved through on-track battery recharging, mainly via braking systems. Due to the high energy demand, drivers must carefully manage when and where to deploy this energy throughout a lap.
This situation forces drivers to focus heavily on energy recovery techniques, adopting more conservative approaches into corners, extended lift-and-coast phases, and managing super-clipping scenarios, all while maintaining competitive pace.
While these elements have contributed to more dynamic and strategically complex races, the artificial nature of some of these racing situations has not gone unnoticed by fans and media alike. Following the Australian Grand Prix, criticism intensified, further fuelled by comments from drivers.
The cancellation of the Bahrain and Saudi Arabian Grands Prix created a one-month gap in the calendar, allowing the FIA additional time to analyse the effectiveness of the new regulations and consider whether adjustments are necessary for the future.
When the key FIA meetings will take place
The first of the three meetings dedicated to discussing the 2026 regulations took place on April 9 and involved technical staff from Formula 1 teams, the FIA, and Formula One Management. The primary goal of this session was to identify possible areas for improvement within the current framework.
The second meeting is scheduled for next Thursday, while the final and most significant session is set for April 20, bringing together team principals and the full group of Formula 1 stewards.
Among the proposals under consideration are adjustments to energy harvesting limits, similar to those already trialled at Suzuka, as well as potential revisions to super-clipping restrictions. Other ideas include increasing power output to 350 kW, allowing greater energy recovery during the formation lap, and modifying certain rules related to the use of active aerodynamics.
Driver reactions and growing calls for change
Several drivers have expressed a strong desire for meaningful changes, including Max Verstappen, Lando Norris, and Fernando Alonso, with many voicing concerns following Oliver Bearman’s incident in Japan.
“The problem is not only related to qualifying, but also to racing. As drivers, we had already warned that this type of incident could happen. Here we were fortunate that there were run-off areas,” said Carlos Sainz.
“As the GPDA, we warned that these incidents will happen more often with these regulations. We need to change something if we do not want them to occur, and I hope we are listened to.”
During the Suzuka weekend, Lewis Hamilton also shared his perspective, stating that energy recovery is the least enjoyable aspect of racing under the current regulations, although he acknowledged that it brings certain benefits.
“I think in karting it is the same. Out of all the cars I have driven over twenty years, this is the only one where I can stay at high speed without losing control. Personally, I find it more enjoyable and this is how racing should be. It should be a constant back and forth, so for me personally, I like it,” said the Ferrari driver.
By the end of the race weekend, however, his opinion appeared to shift slightly. The seven-time world champion admitted that he does not expect much from these meetings, as drivers often feel they are not sufficiently heard in regulatory discussions.
“I hope they bring big changes. We drivers do not have a say and we do not have any power.”







Leave a Reply