FIA deputy president steps down in protest, David Richards slams ‘moral compass shift’. Robert Reid, the FIA Deputy President for Sport, resigned on Thursday.

FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem is facing renewed scrutiny over his leadership after Robert Reid, the FIA Deputy President for Sport, resigned on Thursday. This development has raised significant concerns about the governance of motorsport’s global governing body.

Reid, who is best known for being the co-driver in the 2001 World Rally Championship, had previously supported Ben Sulayem in their successful 2021 election campaign. However, Reid stated that his decision to step down was driven by what he described as a “fundamental breakdown in governance standards” within the FIA. His resignation signals deepening dissatisfaction with the current administration and its handling of motorsport’s regulatory affairs.

This unexpected resignation comes just ahead of Mohammed Ben Sulayem’s first visit to an F1 race this year, a timing that only intensifies the controversy surrounding his leadership. Reid’s frustration had been mounting over time due to what he perceived as ongoing issues with the FIA’s management under Ben Sulayem’s stewardship.

In his resignation statement, Reid expressed that his personal principles made it impossible for him to continue in his role. He confirmed that he had personally informed Ben Sulayem of his decision to resign, underscoring the seriousness of his dissatisfaction with the current state of governance within the FIA. This resignation has ignited fresh questions about the future direction of the organization and the challenges Mohammed Ben Sulayem now faces in restoring confidence within the FIA.

“When I took on this role, it was to serve the FIA’s members; not to serve power. Over time, I have witnessed a steady erosion of the principles we promised to uphold. Decisions are being made behind closed doors, bypassing the very structures and people the FIA exists to represent. My resignation is not about personalities; it is about principles. Motorsport deserves leadership that is accountable, transparent, and member-driven. I can no longer, in good faith, remain part of a system that does not reflect those values.” – he revealed.

Despite initially believing that he had made strides in strengthening governance and empowering member clubs during his tenure at the FIA, Robert Reid has grown increasingly uncomfortable with several aspects of the organization’s operations. Over time, concerns have mounted regarding the transparency and decision-making processes within the FIA, leading to significant dissatisfaction among key figures like Reid.

One of the primary sources of contention has been the way certain rule changes were fast-tracked through the FIA’s World Motor Sport Council, bypassing the usual, thorough process of analysis and open debate. This shift toward accelerated decision-making raised alarms about the quality of oversight and the long-term implications of such practices, which had previously been a hallmark of the FIA’s decision-making framework.

In addition to this, the FIA’s growing reliance on virtual meetings and, more recently, the increasing frequency of rapid e-votes with minimal discussion, has created an environment where proper due diligence appears to be lacking. Reid, in particular, expressed frustration with what he viewed as a growing disconnect from the traditional, more transparent processes that allowed for comprehensive debate and thorough consideration of changes.

The situation worsened when certain members of the World Motor Sport Council (WMSC), including Reid, were excluded from a recent meeting due to their refusal to sign a new non-disclosure agreement (NDA). This move sparked a wave of criticism, most notably from David Richards, the head of Motorsport UK, who condemned the new NDA as a “gagging order” and even hinted at possible legal action in response to what he saw as an overreach of authority.

However, the final straw for Reid came when FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem made the controversial decision to take direct control of the promotion of the World Rallycross Championship. This move, seen by Reid as an inappropriate consolidation of power, ultimately led to his resignation, signaling the culmination of his frustrations with the direction in which the FIA was headed. Reid described the action as one taken without approval from the Senate or the World Council, which could pose a legal risk under European Union competition law. He referred to this as “the final breach of trust and due process.” He also stated that it would not mark the end of his involvement in motorsport, pledging to continue advocating for reform, transparency, and governance that respects the FIA’s members and the integrity of the sport.

Reid’s resignation followed closely after David Richards, head of Motorsport UK, published an open letter reiterating his strong belief that the exclusion of certain members from the World Motor Sport Council (WMSC) for refusing to sign the new non-disclosure agreement (NDA) violated both FIA statutes and French law. Richards’ response was directed at a letter he received from Alberto Villareal, the General Manager of the FIA, which sought to downplay these concerns. In his reply, Richards emphasized his commitment to standing firm on what he believed was right and expressed his intent to discuss these issues directly with FIA President Ben Sulayem during his visit to Bahrain that weekend.

In his letter, David Richards expressed disappointment at Villareal’s response, highlighting what he saw as a disregard for the serious concerns raised, not just by himself but by an increasing number of individuals. He stressed that the governance and constitutional organization of the FIA were becoming increasingly opaque, with power becoming more centralized in the hands of the FIA President alone. David Richards also pointed out that while there were many accomplishments in Geneva over the past three years that deserved recognition, it was unacceptable to allow a shift in leadership values that ignored requests for transparency and open dialogue.

Richards further emphasized the importance of addressing these concerns, stating that he would be in the Middle East for the coming week and hoped to meet with President Ben Sulayem to discuss his views face-to-face, aiming to reach an acceptable resolution.