Ferrari’s Singapore GP qualifying analysis reveals two very different approaches to setting up the SF-26, with Lewis Hamilton appearing to have a car capable of challenging for pole position but one that was particularly difficult to exploit at the limit. Charles Leclerc ultimately secured second place at Marina Bay, ahead of Lewis Hamilton in third, leaving Ferrari as Max Verstappen’s main challenger heading into Sunday’s Grand Prix.
The two Ferrari drivers made contrasting setup decisions, and the effects were clearly visible on track. Lewis Hamilton appeared to have greater outright potential, with a theoretical best lap quick enough for pole, but struggled to combine his strongest sectors. Charles Leclerc adopted a different approach to the car’s balance and ultimately extracted a more effective qualifying performance, despite persistent braking difficulties.
Max Verstappen, meanwhile, maximised the performance of the Red Bull RB22 at a circuit where overtaking is expected to be extremely difficult, particularly against a car with such strong straight-line speed.
Ferrari Singapore GP analysis: Why Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton chose different setups
As Charles Leclerc confirmed after Saturday morning’s Sprint, the two Ferrari drivers had taken significantly different directions with their car balance during Friday’s running.
Charles Leclerc explained that he had adopted an approach that was unusual for him, choosing to increase the emphasis on rear-end stability, and doing so quite aggressively.
That decision helps explain the excessive front-tyre degradation he reported during the closing laps of the Sprint, when the tyres reached their limit on a drying track. It also offers an explanation for his relatively unconvincing performance under braking and on corner entry during Friday evening’s Sprint Qualifying, when a less responsive front end appeared to compromise his speed.
Lewis Hamilton, by contrast, experienced several sudden losses of rear grip in the second and final sectors of his SQ3 lap. He reported that the grip seemed to have shifted entirely towards the front axle, suggesting a setup with a stronger front-end bias.
The result was a cleaner final lap from Charles Leclerc, while Lewis Hamilton appeared more likely to push beyond the car’s optimum operating window.
These contrasting approaches were particularly significant at Marina Bay, where drivers must balance confidence under braking, front-end response and rear traction. The challenge is explored in greater detail in the Marina Bay circuit analysis of Ferrari’s traction and speed requirements.
Lewis Hamilton’s Ferrari setup offered pole potential but was difficult to control
During Grand Prix qualifying, Lewis Hamilton initially showed stronger pace than Charles Leclerc across the sessions. However, when Q3 arrived, putting together a complete lap became much more difficult, recalling the characteristics of the setup he had used on Friday.
The configuration chosen by Lewis Hamilton probably offered greater outright potential, but it also proved harder to control. His theoretical best lap would have been sufficient to secure pole position, yet he was unable to combine that performance into one completed attempt.
Charles Leclerc’s setup decisions ultimately proved more effective, despite the braking-balance problems that troubled him throughout all three qualifying segments. Similar difficulties had also affected him in Malaysia, and they were particularly damaging on a demanding street circuit such as Singapore.
The SF-26 once again demonstrated the effectiveness of its front end, especially under braking. Lewis Hamilton appears to have chosen a setup intended to maximise that advantage, an approach consistent with his braking style.
Charles Leclerc, on the other hand, seems to have used Ferrari’s existing front-end strength to protect the rear axle more effectively. The Monegasque could then recover some front-end load by adjusting the angle of the front-wing flaps during qualifying.
What emerges from these different choices is a car whose full potential was not completely exploited. The SF-26 was extremely quick through the technical sections of Marina Bay, particularly on a relatively green track following the morning rain, but neither driver extracted everything available.
The difference in approach between the Ferrari drivers is striking. Charles Leclerc appears to have moved away from his usual preferences towards a more balanced driving approach, while Lewis Hamilton pursued a more aggressive configuration.
Charles Leclerc changes approach after Malaysia as Ferrari balance remains challenging
At the previous race in Malaysia, Charles Leclerc had adopted an excessively aggressive front-end setup, suffering considerable oversteer during qualifying before proving extremely effective during his recovery drive on Sunday.
His Singapore approach suggests that the Monegasque is still searching for complete confidence in the SF-26, or more precisely, in the characteristics of the cars built under the current Formula 1 regulations.
Lewis Hamilton, meanwhile, has previously been able to establish an advantage over his team-mates through a cleaner and more controlled driving approach.
Given the importance of qualifying position on the streets of Singapore, the garage responsible for car number 44 may have opted for an almost all-out approach, albeit with appropriate caution, in an attempt to maximise single-lap performance.
That decision came remarkably close to delivering pole position for Lewis Hamilton.
For Sunday’s race, Charles Leclerc will start from the dirtier side of the grid, something that has proved costly at recent events. Lewis Hamilton, meanwhile, can take encouragement from the starting difficulties experienced by the Red Bull RB22.
With both Ferrari drivers immediately behind Max Verstappen, the contrasting qualifying performances now create an interesting situation for the Grand Prix. The team has two cars in contention, although their respective starting positions and the difficulty of overtaking at Marina Bay could make the opening moments especially important.
Ferrari SF-26 remains particularly strong through Singapore’s slow corners
Singapore is not an especially demanding circuit in terms of energy management, allowing Ferrari to make the most of the SF-26’s mechanical characteristics through the slow corners.
The suspension compromises that had been evident in Baku and at other circuits were not repeated at Marina Bay, at least not to the same extent.
That allowed Ferrari to exploit the car’s natural strengths without making the same degree of compromise elsewhere in its setup.
On his final Q3 lap, Charles Leclerc consistently gained time through the slower sections of the circuit, particularly during braking and corner entry.
The sector times illustrate Ferrari’s advantage. Max Verstappen recorded a 38.531 in the second sector, compared with 38.401 for Charles Leclerc and an even faster 38.258 for Lewis Hamilton.
At Turn 5, Charles Leclerc prepared the corner exit effectively and even gained time on Max Verstappen, despite the Red Bull driver’s considerable speed and effectiveness on the straights.
Ferrari’s strong performance through the technical sections is consistent with the characteristics previously identified as potential advantages for the SF-26. The team’s cornering performance had already been highlighted in an assessment of why Ferrari could be competitive in Singapore and Austin.
Singapore qualifying telemetry reveals where Lewis Hamilton lost time
Charles Leclerc’s final sector was never particularly strong. On Lewis Hamilton’s fastest Q3 lap, the British driver gained as much as one tenth over his team-mate under braking towards Turns 16 and 17, while Max Verstappen recovered more than 0.070 seconds of his deficit.
These observations reinforce the difficulties Charles Leclerc experienced under braking, even though his overall qualifying performance was ultimately strong enough for second position.
Lewis Hamilton, meanwhile, lost more than one tenth approaching Turns 2 and 3, a significant setback that contributed to his failure to secure pole position.
His first sector was a substantial 0.248 seconds slower than Charles Leclerc’s.
Compared with his Ferrari team-mate, Lewis Hamilton recovered time at Turn 8, on the exit of Turn 9 and through the sequence from Turns 10 to 12.
After Turn 13, the gap fell rapidly to just over one tenth of a second.
The different strengths of the two Ferrari drivers can also be explored through the F1 qualifying telemetry and corner comparison, which allows braking, speed, throttle and lap-time differences to be examined across individual corners.
Lewis Hamilton himself confirmed how difficult the SF-26 was to drive at its absolute limit:
“The car only works when the balance is perfect. Before Q3, we only made a slight change to the brake balance and added one click of front wing.”
His comments underline the narrow operating window that Ferrari needed to manage during qualifying. Even small adjustments could influence how confidently Lewis Hamilton approached the braking zones and how effectively he could exploit the car’s strong front end.
Although the theoretical performance was there, the difficulty of keeping the SF-26 within its optimum balance prevented Lewis Hamilton from converting that potential into pole position.
Why Max Verstappen and Red Bull had the advantage at Marina Bay
Ultimately, Max Verstappen emerged on top, benefiting from a Red Bull RB22 that appears to have a wider operating window following its latest upgrades.
At circuits where major balance compromises are not required, the Red Bull can now compete effectively, even in demanding conditions involving kerbs and bumps.
Max Verstappen also exploited a particular setup designed to maximise the performance of a car that is not necessarily the benchmark in terms of outright aerodynamic downforce.
Nevertheless, the combination of low aerodynamic drag, a competitive Ford-Red Bull Powertrains power unit and an effective rear end made the Austrian team’s package the strongest overall compromise for Singapore qualifying.
That balance proved decisive against Ferrari, which was especially competitive through the slower corners but unable to convert its sector performance into the fastest completed lap.
Ferrari heads into Singapore GP with strong pace but unfinished business
Ferrari’s qualifying performance demonstrated that the SF-26 has the potential to fight at the front at Marina Bay. Charles Leclerc secured second place with a more manageable setup, while Lewis Hamilton’s configuration offered enough theoretical pace for pole but was considerably more difficult to exploit consistently.
The two drivers’ contrasting approaches also highlight the importance of finding the right balance between front-end response and rear stability. Ferrari’s mechanical strengths were particularly effective through Singapore’s technical sections, but extracting the maximum performance remained a delicate exercise.
With Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton starting second and third behind Max Verstappen, Ferrari enters the Grand Prix as Red Bull’s principal challenger. The qualifying result leaves the Maranello team with an opportunity to apply pressure at the start, although converting that potential into a stronger race result will require the right execution on a circuit where overtaking is exceptionally difficult.
Leave a Reply