Following the dramatic events at the 2025 Hungarian Grand Prix, Scuderia Ferrari has come under fresh criticism, with particular focus on the team’s communication strategy. The race in Budapest saw Charles Leclerc leading for many laps before suffering a significant drop in performance in the closing stages, a sudden decline that remains shrouded in mystery despite several theories emerging.
In a recent episode of his popular motorsport podcast, renowned journalist and commentator Giorgio Terruzzi openly criticized how Ferrari is managing these sensitive situations. The primary target of his scrutiny was the communication from Ferrari’s personnel in the aftermath of the Hungarian GP.
During the race, fans and analysts heard the fiery team radio messages from Charles Leclerc, who expressed frustration and anger towards the team’s strategy decisions. Shortly after these exchanges, Charles Leclerc’s SF-25 began losing significant pace compared to rivals. It quickly became apparent that the slowdown was linked to a problem with the car, one that the team was trying to manage.
Post-race interviews added to the confusion, as differing versions emerged — one from the driver Charles Leclerc himself and another from Ferrari Team Principal Frédéric Vasseur. This inconsistency only fueled speculation and criticism regarding the transparency and honesty of Ferrari’s narrative.
Lewis Hamilton also came under scrutiny, not so much for his race results but for his candid remarks after qualifying. The seven-time world champion highlighted internal tensions within the Ferrari team, suggesting that the situation behind the scenes might be far from the harmonious picture often painted by the team’s insiders.
These topics were the focus of discussion on the program “Terruzzi Racconta,” which featured guests including journalist Pino Allievi and technical expert Stefano Nicoli.
The “lies” told by Ferrari
One of the most significant points raised by Giorgio Terruzzi was the perceived inconsistency and incoherence in Ferrari’s official narrative. He highlighted the delayed contract renewal for Frédéric Vasseur as a clear example, stating: “It’s unclear why Stefano Domenicali’s replacement, Vigna, at Silverstone gave that vague statement saying they needed more time to explore other options.”
Regarding the technical problem that compromised Charles Leclerc’s car in Hungary, doubts remain about the official explanation. “It was a mysteriously fading race. The truth, perhaps, was hinted at by George Russell. I’m not convinced by the claim of a chassis failure,” Giorgio Terruzzi declared on his podcast.
Journalist Pino Allievi added: “If your chassis was broken, you’d stop immediately and be lapping eight seconds slower than last place. That doesn’t hold up. The theory about higher tire pressures to protect the plank and reach the finish makes more sense.”
Driver frustrations exposed
Both Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton have made public comments revealing fractures within the Ferrari team. Numerous incidents of intense outbursts over the team radio have shown a lack of cohesion, and the Hungarian Grand Prix weekend was no exception.
Giorgio Terruzzi was particularly critical of Lewis Hamilton’s comments after qualifying twelfth, saying: “Hamilton cannot, with his following and salary, suggest Ferrari should look for another driver. Frankly, that makes no sense.”
All these episodes contribute to revealing the true morale inside the Scuderia. They serve as warning signs for the team’s internal atmosphere and raise concerns about Ferrari’s future stability and performance.
