There are two ways to interpret Charles Leclerc’s reaction after qualifying in Miami: on one hand, there is clear frustration with a Ferrari that still appears limited in pure one-lap performance; on the other, there is a sense of cautious optimism that improvements could come once further work on the power unit and overall package becomes possible later in the season.
For now, however, the Monegasque driver had to settle for another solid third place on the grid, continuing a pattern that has defined much of Ferrari’s 2026 campaign so far.
Compared to the previous day, Charles Leclerc actually improved one position in the final classification, managing to finish ahead of both McLaren drivers. Despite that small step forward, the underlying feeling remains unchanged and has been present since the beginning of the season: Ferrari are still missing that final piece of performance needed to fight consistently at the very front in qualifying.
It is no longer a secret that, in terms of energy deployment and internal combustion performance, Mercedes-powered cars tend to find an extra step in Q3, particularly on the straights. Unless there are occasional software-related issues, as happened yesterday with Andrea Kimi Antonelli, that advantage typically becomes decisive when it matters most.
That same pattern appeared again in Miami. Data analysis shows that the Monegasque lost significant time in the first sector alone, especially between Turn 2 and Turn 4, where he was approximately three tenths slower and nearly 20 km/h down compared to the pole position benchmark. Interestingly, this is also the same area where Antonelli suffered a deployment issue in Friday qualifying before bouncing back with pole on Saturday.
However, Ferrari’s situation is different and more structural. It reflects a recurring limitation that has been present since the early stages of the season, where the team is forced to accept compromises in different parts of the lap in order to remain competitive overall.
As also seen in the Sprint, staying close to the front-running pack requires sacrificing performance in certain sectors. Charles Leclerc’s lap once again highlighted this balancing act, where time lost in the first sector is partially recovered on the longer straights in the middle and final sectors.
The issue, however, is that the compromise remains imperfect. At present, Ferrari simply do not have enough margin to optimise all sectors simultaneously, whereas Mercedes are able to exploit stronger combustion performance to mask weaknesses and still secure strong qualifying results, including front-row positions.
Leclerc himself acknowledged this limitation clearly in his post-session interview with Sky, pointing out that the deficit is mainly linked to engine performance when it comes to extracting the final few horsepower and maximising energy management in Q3.
“The second position was maybe possible, maybe even pole to be honest. But the fact is that the others arrive in Q3 with another gear, it’s always like that since the start of the year, so for now we simply don’t have that extra gear,” said Charles Leclerc, also pointing to car balance and overall feeling as areas needing improvement.
Interestingly, Ferrari’s performance trend across the weekend has not been entirely linear. On Friday, the car appeared more competitive on medium tyres, while struggling more on soft compounds in the search for ultimate lap time. Charles Leclerc himself was among the drivers with the smallest improvement margin between Q2 and Q3, struggling to bring the soft tyre into the optimal operating window.
However, Saturday’s qualifying was influenced not only by tyre behaviour but also by changing track conditions. Slight variations in grip combined with stronger wind gusts made the cars more difficult to control, increasing instability on fast sections.
Even McLaren appeared to struggle in similar conditions, reinforcing the idea that Miami’s qualifying session was shaped by external factors as much as pure performance. Still, Charles Leclerc was clear that Ferrari also lost time due to their own limitations, especially compared to Friday’s more stable conditions.
“Apart from that, the feeling with the car was a bit worse than yesterday, so we lost a bit of performance ourselves compared to Friday. And then the others have that extra gear in Q3 that we don’t have, for now…” the 28-year-old added.
Looking ahead, attention now turns to Sunday’s race, which is expected to take place in wet conditions. That could significantly change the competitive order and open up opportunities for Ferrari to capitalise on strategic decisions and race pace, an area where the team has often been more competitive than in qualifying.
Charles Leclerc’s P3 finish in Miami qualifying underscores both Ferrari’s consistency and its current technical limitations, as the team looks toward future engine development opportunities to finally bridge the power gap to its Mercedes-powered rivals.
