Charles Leclerc feels Ferrari’s main weakness in the 2026 Formula 1 season is a shortage of raw performance rather than an inability to prepare the SF-26 effectively for race weekends. Although the Maranello team frequently looks competitive during Friday practice, the Monegasque has explained why that encouraging early pace does not always translate into equally strong qualifying results against Mercedes and Red Bull.
Ferrari has often arrived at circuits with a well-balanced car that its drivers can immediately push towards the limit. However, Leclerc believes the apparent advantage during the opening practice sessions can be misleading, particularly because rival teams may be operating their power units differently before extracting more performance in qualifying.
His assessment comes at a difficult stage of the championship for Ferrari. Earlier optimism about mounting a serious title challenge has diminished, with the Scuderia still searching for another Grand Prix victory following Leclerc’s success at the British Grand Prix in July.
Charles Leclerc explains why Ferrari’s Friday pace can be misleading
Charles Leclerc has challenged the assumption that Ferrari’s strong performances in opening practice sessions necessarily demonstrate an advantage in preparing its car compared with other Formula 1 teams.
The Ferrari driver acknowledged that the Scuderia frequently begins weekends competitively, but suggested that the difference between its own engine settings and those used by rivals plays an important role in the early running order.
In Leclerc’s assessment, competing teams appear to have additional performance available when qualifying begins. Consequently, Ferrari can look relatively stronger in FP1 than it does later in the weekend, when the other manufacturers exploit capabilities that the Italian team currently lacks.
That distinction helps explain why an encouraging practice result does not always provide an accurate indication of Ferrari’s prospects for pole position. The performance displayed during the opening sessions must be considered alongside the different operating conditions and power-unit settings used by rival cars.
Leclerc does not believe the issue can be explained simply by Ferrari extracting more from its machinery earlier than everyone else. Instead, he considers the underlying performance difference between the SF-26 and the leading competitors to be a more significant factor.
Ferrari’s simulator preparation remains an important SF-26 strength
Despite identifying a performance deficit, Charles Leclerc also highlighted one aspect of Ferrari’s operation that he considers particularly effective: its preparation before arriving at a Grand Prix circuit.
The Monegasque explained that Ferrari has developed a strong ability to begin race weekends with a car that already possesses a comfortable balance. This allows the drivers to concentrate on refining the set-up rather than spending the opening sessions correcting major handling problems.
However, the SF-26 is not necessarily an easy car to operate across every condition. Leclerc described its characteristics as relatively sensitive, meaning that achieving the correct balance remains important for extracting the performance available.
Ferrari’s preparation work at Maranello has helped the team manage that sensitivity. According to Leclerc, the correlation between simulator predictions and the car’s behaviour on the circuit has been particularly strong recently.
That relationship allows Ferrari’s engineers and drivers to complete useful preparation in the simulator before the race weekend begins. When the real car responds as expected, the team can arrive at the circuit with a competitive starting configuration and a balance that gives its drivers confidence.
The relationship between set-up sensitivity and car behaviour has also featured in our Ferrari SF-26 Singapore Grand Prix technical analysis, where the Scuderia’s handling characteristics and performance limitations were examined in greater detail.
Why Charles Leclerc believes better balance cannot replace raw performance
Charles Leclerc was careful to distinguish between optimising a car’s existing potential and increasing the performance it can ultimately deliver.
He rejected the idea that deliberately developing a more sensitive or narrowly focused car would necessarily allow Ferrari to unlock additional speed. Although the team can prepare the SF-26 effectively and find a set-up that works well for the drivers, those strengths do not eliminate its underlying deficit against the leading rivals.
In his assessment, Ferrari is already doing valuable work to extract performance through preparation and simulator correlation. The problem is that the maximum potential of the current package remains below that of its principal competitors.
This distinction is important because it separates the effectiveness of Ferrari’s race-weekend operations from the fundamental competitiveness of its machinery. A well-prepared car can allow a driver to maximise the available performance without necessarily possessing enough outright speed to compete for pole position or victory.
For Leclerc, the solution therefore involves improving the car’s inherent capability rather than simply making its existing characteristics more extreme.
Ferrari’s 2026 power unit contributes to its performance challenges
Ferrari’s difficulties also involve the relationship between its chassis and power unit. While the SF-26 chassis is regarded as one of the strongest on the grid, the engine package has struggled to match the performance available from Mercedes and Red Bull.
One important factor is Ferrari’s decision to adopt a smaller turbocharger. The design was intended to reduce turbo lag and improve drivability, particularly at lower speeds, where responsive power delivery can help the driver manage acceleration.
However, this approach has also involved a compromise at the upper end of the speed range. The smaller turbocharger has contributed to Ferrari’s difficulties with outright straight-line performance, despite the advantages it provides in slower sections.
Ferrari introduced a revised power-unit design at the Italian Grand Prix to address the limitations associated with its turbocharger configuration. Nevertheless, the broader performance deficit remains part of the challenge facing the team.
The differences between Ferrari and its competitors in recorded straight-line speed can be explored through the F1 top-speed comparison tool, which allows individual speed measurements to be compared across Grand Prix sessions.
For Leclerc, the combination of strong chassis characteristics, effective preparation and continuing power-unit limitations helps explain why Ferrari can be competitive in certain situations without consistently matching its rivals when maximum performance is required.
Ferrari needs more outright speed to return to winning form
The challenge for Ferrari is particularly significant after the team’s early-season ambitions gave way to a more difficult competitive period. Since Charles Leclerc’s victory at Silverstone in July, the Scuderia has been unable to add another Grand Prix win.
Improving the SF-26’s underlying performance has consequently become a central objective as the championship approaches its final rounds. The team has been preparing further technical developments, with Ferrari’s planned Austin upgrades offering a potential response to Charles Leclerc’s concerns about losing ground to rival manufacturers.
However, the Ferrari driver’s assessment makes clear that the existing strengths of the team should not be confused with evidence that its car has the same overall potential as those of its main competitors.
Strong simulator correlation, productive preparation and a comfortable starting balance can all improve how efficiently Ferrari operates during a Grand Prix weekend. They cannot, by themselves, overcome a fundamental lack of performance.
For Charles Leclerc, that is the essential issue facing the Scuderia. Ferrari has become effective at preparing the SF-26 and extracting its available potential, but it still needs greater outright speed if it is to challenge Mercedes and Red Bull more consistently for Formula 1 victories.
Leave a Reply