Lewis Hamilton’s continued criticism following the Mexican Grand Prix may have a deliberate purpose, according to Formula 1 journalist Roberto Chinchero. Speaking during the opening free practice session of the 2026 Brazilian Grand Prix, Roberto Chinchero questioned why the Ferrari driver had returned to the controversy four days after the race, suggesting that the seven-time world champion knows exactly what he wants to achieve when making such strong public statements.
The discussion centres on Lewis Hamilton’s reaction to the events in Mexico, which the British driver believes cost him the race. While Roberto Chinchero considers his immediate frustration understandable, he believes the decision to continue discussing the incident several days later deserves closer attention, particularly given Lewis Hamilton’s extensive experience in Formula 1.
Roberto Chinchero questions Lewis Hamilton’s response to the Mexico GP controversy
Analysing the situation during the Brazilian Grand Prix weekend, Roberto Chinchero suggested that an earlier discussion could have helped Lewis Hamilton gain a clearer understanding of the circumstances surrounding the incident.
“If there had been a discussion beforehand, Hamilton would probably have received clearer guidance. I understand his immediate reaction because he is convinced that what happened in Mexico cost him the race. However, continuing to discuss it four days later seems excessive to me,” Roberto Chinchero explained.
The comments come amid wider discussion about Lewis Hamilton’s relationship with Charles Leclerc at Ferrari, with the events of the Mexican Grand Prix bringing renewed attention to the team’s internal dynamics.
Why Roberto Chinchero believes Lewis Hamilton’s words are deliberate
For Roberto Chinchero, the most significant aspect of the controversy is Lewis Hamilton’s experience. Having spent many years competing at the highest level of Formula 1, the Ferrari driver understands how his public comments can influence discussions surrounding a team.
“Lewis knows this environment extremely well, he has experience and knows how to handle himself. When he takes such a firm position, he is unlikely to do so without having a specific objective in mind,” Roberto Chinchero added.
Rather than treating Lewis Hamilton’s remarks simply as a reaction made in the heat of the moment, Roberto Chinchero therefore believes the timing and firmness of his comments may reflect a more considered decision.
His assessment raises an important distinction between a driver’s immediate frustration after a difficult Grand Prix and the choice to revisit the same disagreement several days later. In Roberto Chinchero’s view, Lewis Hamilton’s familiarity with Formula 1 makes it difficult to dismiss that decision as accidental.
The discussion also highlights the importance of communication within Ferrari, particularly when race incidents lead to disagreements or differing interpretations. The relationship between the team’s drivers has already been the subject of further attention, with Fred Vasseur addressing the resolution of tensions between Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc.
Although Roberto Chinchero did not identify a specific objective behind Lewis Hamilton’s remarks, his interpretation is clear: the seven-time world champion understands the significance of his words and is unlikely to adopt such a firm public position without a reason.
Leave a Reply