Scuderia Fans

  • News
  • Current Drivers
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Lewis Hamilton
  • Races
    • 2026 F1 Hungarian Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Dutch Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Italian Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Spanish Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Azerbaijan Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Bahrain Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Singapore Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 United States Grand Prix
  • Formula 1 Statistics
  • Ferrari F1 World Champions
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Kimi Raikkonen
    • Niki Lauda
    • Jody Scheckter
    • John Surtees
    • Phil Hill
    • Mike Hawthorn
    • Juan-Manuel Fangio
    • Alberto Ascari
  • Former Ferrari drivers
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Felipe Massa
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Gilles Villeneuve
    • Jean Alesi
    • Alain Prost
    • Nigel Mansell
    • Gerhard Berger
    • Mario Andretti
    • Rubens Barrichello
    • Michele Alboreto
    • Patrick Tambay
    • Eddie Irvine
    • Rene Arnoux
    • Didier Pironi
    • Jacky Ickx
    • Carlos Reutemann
    • Clay Regazzoni
    • Stefan Johansson
    • Arturo Merzario
    • Giancarlo Fisichella
    • Carlos Sainz
  • Ferrari WEC
  • F1 TICKETS
  • Advertise with ScuderiaFans
  • Ferrari F1 Shop
  • Home
  • Formula 1 Schedule & Results
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
  • Contact us
Home » George Russell refuses to blame Lewis Hamilton after dramatic Spa retirement

George Russell refuses to blame Lewis Hamilton after dramatic Spa retirement. George Russell reveals why his opening lap at Spa felt “dangerous”.

Ferrari vs Mercedes W17, George Russell, 2026 F1

George Russell has defended Lewis Hamilton following their opening-lap collision at the 2026 Belgian Grand Prix, describing the incident at Spa-Francorchamps as a normal racing incident rather than a reckless move by the Ferrari driver. Although the stewards gave Lewis Hamilton a five-second penalty, George Russell directed most of his frustration towards the Mercedes power-unit problem that left him virtually defenceless on the Kemmel Straight.

The Mercedes driver revealed that his battery failed to recharge after La Source, leaving him with only 35 per cent energy before it dropped to zero at the top of Eau Rouge. That loss of electrical power also affected the boost system and allowed three cars to pass him before the contact with Lewis Hamilton at Turn 5 ended his Belgian Grand Prix.

George Russell left speechless by Belgian GP retirement

“I don’t know what to say. I have no words at the moment,” George Russell admitted shortly after his dramatic retirement on the opening lap of the Belgian Grand Prix. His tone of voice made clear how emotional and disappointed he was following an incident that brought his race to an immediate end.

After making a strong start, the British Mercedes driver reached the Kemmel Straight in a promising position. However, he was then rapidly reeled in by the two Ferraris, with both Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton overtaking him as his W17 suddenly lost performance.

Add ScuderiaFans.com as your preferred Google News source for Formula 1 updates

Lewis Hamilton’s pass was particularly significant because it helped create the circumstances that led to the contact at Turn 5. George Russell attempted to resist his former Mercedes team-mate by braking late at the end of the Kemmel Straight and remaining on the outside for the first part of the sequence, which would have placed him on the inside for the following corner.

According to the interpretation presented in the source, Lewis Hamilton left enough room on his left, while George Russell did not squeeze the Ferrari towards the inside. Car number 44 then moved slightly towards the left because of its behaviour through the corner rather than as a result of a deliberate manoeuvre by Lewis Hamilton, making contact between the two cars unavoidable.

George Russell spun and came to a halt on the outside of the corner, with no opportunity to rejoin the race. However, his greatest frustration was not directed at the collision itself. Instead, he was angered by the lack of power that had allowed the Ferraris to close so rapidly on the Kemmel Straight and placed him in such a vulnerable situation.

Ferrari F1 merchandise

George Russell describes Hamilton clash as a racing incident

George Russell made it clear that he did not regard Lewis Hamilton’s actions as intentional or reckless. He believed the contact was the consequence of several cars arriving together after his Mercedes suddenly lost straight-line performance.

“I was completely swallowed up on the straight, on the Kemmel Straight,” George Russell said. “I lost three positions at that moment before reaching Turn 5, and then the contact was a normal racing incident.”

Lewis Hamilton was nevertheless handed a five-second penalty, which he served during his pit stop. The Ferrari driver ultimately recovered to fourth place, while George Russell was unable to score after his first-lap retirement.

The incident also unfolded during a weekend in which energy deployment was a major talking point. Before the race, Lewis Hamilton had already questioned the battery-driven nature of overtaking under the 2026 regulations, particularly at a circuit where differences in available electrical energy can have a dramatic effect on straight-line performance.

Mercedes battery failed to recharge after Turn 1

George Russell then offered a more detailed explanation of the technical problem that compromised his race. He said his initial launch had been strong and that he had positioned himself directly behind Max Verstappen after negotiating the opening corner successfully.

“I made a good start,” George Russell explained. “I took the first corner very well and immediately tucked in behind Max Verstappen. But, for some reason, the battery decided not to recharge at Turn 1. I went through the first corner, the battery did not recharge, and I came out of it with only 35 per cent charge.”

“Because it did not recharge, I also had a problem with the boost.”

The 2026 Formula 1 power units rely much more heavily on electrical energy, making efficient harvesting and deployment crucial to both lap time and racecraft. Spa places additional pressure on those systems because cars must deploy energy for an extended period from the exit of La Source, through Eau Rouge and Raidillon, and along the Kemmel Straight.

The challenge had already been highlighted by the FIA’s revised energy rules for the Belgian Grand Prix, which forced teams to pay particular attention to MGU-K management around the lap.

George Russell says the loss of power was dangerous

The problem was not limited to the battery. George Russell said the failure also prevented the turbo and boost system from operating correctly, leaving his Mercedes without the performance needed to defend against the cars behind.

“The turbo was unable to manage itself correctly, so I had no power,” George Russell continued. “I reached the top of Eau Rouge with the battery at zero per cent. Frankly, it was dangerous. Three cars overtook me. I should never have been in that situation, and that is what makes me most angry.”

His comments underline how quickly a loss of electrical deployment can transform a driver’s position under the 2026 regulations. George Russell went from believing he could challenge near the front after La Source to being passed by several cars before reaching the next braking zone.

The issue was especially costly because the Mercedes driver felt he had placed himself in an excellent position during the opening moments of the race. Rather than fighting for the lead, he suddenly found himself trying to defend without the power required to do so safely.

George Russell says Lewis Hamilton did nothing reckless

George Russell acknowledged that Lewis Hamilton carried more responsibility for the eventual contact, but he stopped short of criticising the seven-time world champion’s driving. He emphasised that the Ferrari driver had not caused the collision deliberately and had not attempted anything he considered reckless.

“Lewis Hamilton didn’t do it on purpose,” George Russell said. “He had more responsibility than I did, but he did nothing reckless. Perhaps I could have opened my line a little more, and perhaps he could have braked slightly earlier, but that incident should never have happened if I had possessed the necessary straight-line speed. I am really very disappointed.”

George Russell’s assessment therefore differed in tone from the stewards’ ruling. While he accepted that Lewis Hamilton bore a greater share of responsibility, he viewed the accident primarily as a consequence of the technical failure and the unusual situation it created on the opening lap.

The stewards ultimately decided that Lewis Hamilton was responsible and imposed the five-second sanction. However, they also recognised mitigating circumstances, including the reduced grip, limited space and the Ferrari driver’s attempt to avoid the collision.

George Russell’s anger focused on Mercedes power-unit failure

George Russell’s comments suggested that the collision with Lewis Hamilton could reasonably be viewed from a driver’s perspective as a racing incident. Nevertheless, race control chose to penalise the Ferrari driver, with the five seconds added to his pit-stop time during the Grand Prix.

For George Russell, the more important concern was the Mercedes power-unit failure that had triggered the entire sequence. The W17’s lack of energy and boost prevented him from maintaining his position and exposed him to several overtakes before Turn 5.

“I appreciate that everyone is working hard to solve the problem, but I was the one in that position at that moment of the race,” George Russell concluded. “I felt as though I was in an excellent position to fight for the lead at Turn 1. Then, suddenly, there was no power and everything went up in smoke.”

The retirement proved costly for both George Russell and Mercedes. He left Spa without points, while Ferrari capitalised through Charles Leclerc’s second place and Lewis Hamilton’s recovery to fourth. The incident also demonstrated once again how decisive battery recovery, energy deployment and boost management have become under Formula 1’s new technical regulations.

Jul 19, 2026David Carter
Click here to set ScuderiaFans.com as your preferred Google Discover source and find our content more easily!
Charles Leclerc explains how Ferrari challenged for Belgian GP victory despite straight-line deficitFerrari Belgian GP team radio: Charles Leclerc reflects on P2 as Lewis Hamilton accepts blame

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

David Carter

David Carter is a ScuderiaFans editorial byline for race-weekend analysis, strategy and Ferrari performance. His coverage examines the decisions and developments that shape each Grand Prix.

3 months ago 2026 F1 Belgian Grand Prix, Lewis Hamilton, News, Other teams2026 Formula 1 season, Belgian GP, George Russell, Lewis Hamilton, Scuderia Ferrari58
Next F1 race
0 Days
00 Hours
00 Mins
00 Secs
RACE DAY
until lights out
Gear up with Ferrari merchandise!
Buy official Ferrari 2026 F1 products
2026 Formula 1 calendar

Complete 2026 Formula 1 calendar with all Grand Prix dates and locations

Latest Ferrari technical analysis
Ferrari SF-26, suspension, brake discs, garage, 2026 F1, mechanics
Ferrari finds promising SF-26 improvements at Austin ahead of 2027 F1 development
19 hours ago
Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari SF-26, garage, 2026 F1, pitlane
Ferrari SF-26 Austin upgrades analysed: how much performance has the new package added?
23 hours ago
Ferrari SF-26, suspension, garage, 2026 F1
Ferrari SF-26 Austin upgrades explained: four key aerodynamic changes for US GP
1 day ago
Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-26, 2026 F1
Ferrari’s United States GP SF-26 upgrades could provide key lessons for 2027
1 day ago
Ferrari SF-26, wet, 2026 F1
Ferrari SF-26 slow-corner weakness: how Austin upgrades could help
1 day ago

Latest articles

  • Ferrari’s Austin Q3 mystery: Charles Leclerc blames tyres, Lewis Hamilton points to engine deficit
  • Lewis Hamilton jokes about his age as F1 drivers criticise Austin track bumps
  • US GP telemetry: Charles Leclerc had front-row pace before Q3 problems
  • Why Ferrari keeps losing performance between practice and qualifying in F1 2026
  • Ferrari’s Austin GP strategy dilemma: Leclerc has tyre option Hamilton lacks
Partners
Betwinner

non-GamStop casinos

best online casinos not on GamStop

bwacademy

magyarkaszinooldalak

GP-News - latest F1 news updates

The most accurate sports predictions and latest news available on TipsGG

1Win

no deposit casinos at GHZD Betpack Mostbet Pakistan australiacasinopokies top canadian casinos

Formula 1 News

Guitar Junky

Best Intraday Tips

Contact Center Company

SilverArrows.Net - Mercedes F1 news

TopSpeed

Esports Forum

Racing Statistics

Fixture Calendar

Live F1 Results

You can find reel-based games without download or registration via free slots on Slotozilla

Uusia Nettikasinoita
Thailand Walking Street

de bedste odds uden ROFUS på Leadership.ng

Get In Touch With Us

  • Advertise with ScuderiaFans
  • Contact us
  • Corrections Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Support ScuderiaFans.com

Meet the team

  • About us
  • Our writers
  • Formula 1 Circuits
  • 2026 Formula 1 Calendar
  • Formula 1 Statistics & Analysis
  • Ferrari F1 FAQ

© 2016–2026 Scuderia Fans Ltd. All rights reserved.

Scuderia Fans Ltd.
199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392
2016 © Scuderia Fans