Ferrari endured another frustrating afternoon at the 2026 Brazilian Grand Prix, with inconsistent performance, uncertain strategy decisions and a costly late penalty for Charles Leclerc exposing familiar weaknesses within the Maranello team. Lewis Hamilton’s decision to ignore an instruction from the pit wall added another complication to a race in which the SF-26 failed to deliver the recovery Ferrari had hoped for at Interlagos.
“It will be a challenge,” Fred Vasseur had warned after qualifying, looking ahead to Sunday’s Brazilian Grand Prix. For Ferrari, however, it was a challenge that ultimately went unmet. The weekend was supposed to demonstrate the benefits of the power unit updates and provide an opportunity for both drivers to fight their way through the field. Instead, the demanding conditions at the Brazilian circuit and the SF-26’s lack of consistent pace prevented the anticipated comeback.
Pace, uncertainty, mistakes and penalties are perhaps the four words that best describe Ferrari’s race. The final setback came when Charles Leclerc, driving car number 16, made contact with the rear wheel of Liam Lawson’s Racing Bulls during the closing stages. The stewards opened an investigation but postponed their decision until after the chequered flag, eventually handing Charles Leclerc a five-second time penalty that dropped him to eighth place.
Ferrari’s Brazilian GP struggles expose the limitations of the SF-26
Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton started from 14th and 20th respectively, with the Monegasque ahead of his British team-mate. Lewis Hamilton made an aggressive getaway when the lights went out, immediately gaining positions and climbing into the top ten. Unfortunately, he was unable to maintain that level of competitiveness throughout the 71-lap race.
Charles Leclerc, meanwhile, made a relatively uneventful start. He remained in his original position for several laps before gradually beginning to work his way through the field.
Ferrari’s lack of pace was particularly evident on the intermediate tyres, with the SF-26 even losing a position to Fernando Alonso’s Aston Martin. The situation improved gradually once the drivers switched to the soft compound. In terms of strategy, Charles Leclerc completed two pit stops, while Lewis Hamilton stopped three times and ran two stints on the red-marked soft tyres.
It was on the soft compound that Ferrari finally showed glimpses of greater competitiveness. Although the improvement was less evident for Charles Leclerc, Lewis Hamilton demonstrated what the SF-26 could achieve when the tyres were working effectively.
After fitting his second set of soft tyres, the seven-time world champion suddenly found more performance, recording several personal-best sector times in the middle part of the lap. His lap times improved progressively, first reaching the 1:14 range, then 1:13.9 and finally 1:13.7.
However, this burst of speed lasted only during the opening phase of the fresh tyre stint. As the laps accumulated, the Ferrari gradually returned to its previous level of performance, highlighting the difficulty of maintaining a competitive rhythm over a longer distance. The changing pace also underlined the importance of tyre and stint performance in determining Ferrari’s race.
Speaking to Sky Sport after the Grand Prix, Fred Vasseur offered an interesting explanation for the team’s difficulties. According to the French manager, Ferrari’s inconsistent pace was not simply the result of shortcomings in the car’s outright performance. Tyre pressures, the challenging track conditions and mistakes made by the drivers on the wet surface all contributed to the disappointing outcome.
“We were inconsistent because of the difficult conditions at Interlagos,” Fred Vasseur explained.
“There was potential, and it was a shame,” the Ferrari team principal admitted.
Fred Vasseur then returned to a familiar theme that has repeatedly emerged throughout the season: Ferrari’s inability to bring all the necessary elements together over the course of a race weekend. That weakness becomes particularly damaging when conditions are as unpredictable as they were in Brazil.
Ferrari strategy uncertainty and Lewis Hamilton’s costly decision
The difficulties with race pace also highlighted two other problems: uncertainty and mistakes. The first was particularly evident in Charles Leclerc’s strategy. Unlike Lewis Hamilton, the Monegasque made only two pit stops, completing approximately 40 laps on the soft compound.
During the closing stages, his pace declined and became slower than that of the drivers occupying the leading positions. One possible explanation for such an extended stint is that Ferrari was waiting for the expected rain, hoping to avoid an additional stop for slick tyres and switch directly to intermediates when conditions deteriorated. However, that interpretation remains unconfirmed.
Did the decision compromise Charles Leclerc’s race? Probably not to any significant extent, considering that he crossed the finish line in seventh position before receiving his penalty. Nevertheless, the strategy is difficult to assess definitively, particularly given the contrasting performance of the two Ferrari drivers.
Lewis Hamilton’s second stint on soft tyres followed a similar pattern to his earlier running. The British driver initially found additional speed on the fresh compound but subsequently settled back into the pace of the surrounding cars. Charles Leclerc also supported Fred Vasseur’s post-race assessment, although he acknowledged that Ferrari had not been entirely without pace once the softer tyres were fitted.
The third major problem was the execution of key decisions, and Lewis Hamilton’s race provided the clearest example. Once again, the seven-time world champion took matters into his own hands rather than following the instruction from Ferrari’s pit wall.
Around lap 63, as heavy rain returned to Interlagos, Lewis Hamilton was called into the pits by his race engineer. However, he decided to remain on track. It did not take long for the consequences of that decision to become apparent.
Already in the first sector, Lewis Hamilton realised that the rain was intensifying and that the soft slick tyres, which had previously given him a reasonable feeling with the car, were no longer suited to the deteriorating conditions.
Television footage showed the Ferrari driver struggling to keep his SF-26 on the circuit. His difficulties culminated in a spin at the corner immediately preceding the pit-lane entrance, turning an already complicated race into an even more frustrating afternoon.
Speaking to Sky Sport afterwards, Lewis Hamilton accepted responsibility for the mistake but also suggested that Ferrari’s pit wall shared some of the blame. The British driver explained that he had not received sufficient information to assess the changing track conditions accurately.
He concluded his post-race comments by acknowledging that everyone involved needed to learn from the incident and improve together. The episode once again raised questions about communication between Lewis Hamilton and Ferrari’s pit wall, particularly when rapid decisions are required in unpredictable weather.
Was Lewis Hamilton right or wrong to disregard the instruction? It is difficult to reach a definitive conclusion. What is clear is that this was the second occasion on which he chose not to follow the team’s direction, opening the door to several possible interpretations.
Does the situation suggest a lack of confidence in Ferrari’s strategic decisions? Could the seven-time world champion be attempting to assert greater influence within the team? Or are these simply instinctive decisions made under the pressure of racing? The incident raises questions, but none of those explanations can be established with certainty.
Ferrari leaves Brazil as the fourth force behind McLaren, Mercedes and Red Bull
One of the clearest conclusions from the Brazilian Grand Prix is that Ferrari remained remarkably consistent in its position within the competitive order. Across the weekend’s sessions, the Maranello team appeared to be the fourth-strongest constructor, behind McLaren, Mercedes and Red Bull.
Ferrari still managed to collect championship points, but the return was limited and offered little encouragement in the Constructors’ Championship battle. The result also reinforced concerns about the team’s ability to maximise opportunities when the SF-26 is not operating in its ideal performance window.
Interlagos was a circuit that should have highlighted some of the car’s stronger characteristics. Ferrari’s principal advantage was expected to come from the chassis rather than the power unit, making the Brazilian layout a potentially favourable venue.
Instead, the team once again struggled to translate those theoretical strengths into a convincing race performance. The difficult weather undoubtedly played a role, but the broader pattern extends beyond Brazil.
Looking back over the season, Ferrari has also underperformed at other circuits that appeared well suited to the SF-26, including Hungary and the Netherlands. A combination of mistakes, unsuccessful strategic decisions and insufficient performance has repeatedly prevented the team from achieving the results it might have expected.
The Brazilian Grand Prix therefore represents more than an isolated disappointment. It adds to the questions surrounding Ferrari’s ability to extract the full potential of its car, particularly when changing conditions demand precise execution from both the drivers and the pit wall.
Why Ferrari’s Brazilian GP problems raise concerns ahead of Las Vegas
Ferrari’s next opportunity to respond will come in two weeks at the Las Vegas Grand Prix, a race that Fred Vasseur expects to present another demanding challenge.
The French manager has described the American street circuit as particularly difficult and extreme, not least because of the low temperatures expected during the event. Bringing the tyres into their correct operating window will be essential, and that is precisely an area in which Ferrari has repeatedly encountered difficulties, especially with the softest compounds.
The concern is that the SF-26 struggled considerably on a cold track in Brazil, raising doubts about how effectively the team will manage similar challenges in Las Vegas. With tyre preparation and consistency already proving problematic, Ferrari will need to find answers before arriving at the next race.
Ultimately, the Brazilian Grand Prix was a weekend to forget for the Maranello team. Ferrari concludes the three-race American sequence having lost the positive momentum generated by its performances in Austin and Mexico City.
What began as an opportunity to demonstrate progress instead ended with another disappointing result, familiar strategic concerns and renewed questions about communication within the team. The five-second penalty handed to Charles Leclerc after his meeting with the stewards, which dropped him from seventh to eighth, provided the final blow to an especially difficult weekend for the Prancing Horse.
Leave a Reply