Scuderia Fans

  • News
  • Current Drivers
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Lewis Hamilton
  • Races
    • 2026 F1 Hungarian Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Dutch Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Italian Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Spanish Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Azerbaijan Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Bahrain Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Singapore Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 United States Grand Prix
  • Formula 1 Statistics
  • Ferrari F1 World Champions
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Kimi Raikkonen
    • Niki Lauda
    • Jody Scheckter
    • John Surtees
    • Phil Hill
    • Mike Hawthorn
    • Juan-Manuel Fangio
    • Alberto Ascari
  • Former Ferrari drivers
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Felipe Massa
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Gilles Villeneuve
    • Jean Alesi
    • Alain Prost
    • Nigel Mansell
    • Gerhard Berger
    • Mario Andretti
    • Rubens Barrichello
    • Michele Alboreto
    • Patrick Tambay
    • Eddie Irvine
    • Rene Arnoux
    • Didier Pironi
    • Jacky Ickx
    • Carlos Reutemann
    • Clay Regazzoni
    • Stefan Johansson
    • Arturo Merzario
    • Giancarlo Fisichella
    • Carlos Sainz
  • Ferrari WEC
  • F1 TICKETS
  • Advertise with ScuderiaFans
  • Ferrari F1 Shop
  • Home
  • Formula 1 Schedule & Results
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
  • Contact us
Home » Could Ferrari have challenged for pole at Silverstone? Detailed telemetry analysis from qualifying

Could Ferrari have challenged for pole at Silverstone? Detailed telemetry analysis from qualifying. Ferrari missed out on a potential pole position at Silverstone due to key mistakes in Q3.

Following a series of highly promising free practice sessions at the Silverstone Circuit, expectations within the Scuderia Ferrari team were extremely high heading into the qualifying session. The SF-25 had shown from the outset an ability to combine strong performance in both low-speed and high-speed sections of the track—something that had previously been lacking. For the first time in the 2025 Formula 1 season, Ferrari appeared to be genuinely in contention for pole position.

Up until Q2, that belief remained solid, with both Scuderia Ferrari drivers consistently at the top of the time sheets. However, when it mattered most during the final and decisive phase of Q3, the outcome was quite different. Both Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton had to settle for places on the third row of the grid. This naturally raises the question: did Ferrari actually have the performance necessary to secure pole position, or were the strong early weekend showings simply misleading? To answer this, we turn to a detailed telemetry analysis, comparing the final flying laps of the Ferrari drivers with that of Red Bull Racing’s Max Verstappen, who secured pole position for the British Grand Prix.

First sector: Red Bull gains on the straights, Ferrari claws back in the corners

In the opening sector of the Silverstone circuit, Max Verstappen immediately gained the upper hand. Red Bull Racing’s choice to adopt a lower-downforce aerodynamic setup gave the RB21 higher straight-line speed—reaching 5 kilometers per hour more than the Ferrari SF-25. This resulted in a gain of approximately two tenths of a second for Verstappen by the time the drivers reached Turn 3.

Add ScuderiaFans.com as your preferred Google News source for Formula 1 updates

In the slower section that followed, however, the situation shifted. The Ferrari drivers were able to regain the gap by carrying around 15 kilometers per hour more speed into the corners. Still, a small mistake by Charles Leclerc on corner exit forced him to delay getting back on the throttle, which cost him roughly one-tenth of a second compared to teammate Lewis Hamilton.

Max Verstappen continued to gain valuable hundredths of a second on the subsequent straights, interrupted by the medium-speed support corners of Turns 6 and 7. While Ferrari’s higher downforce helped in these corners, Max Verstappen’s excellent car control and driving minimized the deficit to just half a tenth.

At Copse Corner, both Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton lifted slightly—around 10 percent—while Charles Leclerc took it flat out. Even so, in the straights both before and after Copse, Verstappen’s top speed advantage once again proved decisive, allowing him to gain over two tenths of a second. However, a notable difference was recorded at the entrance to the high-speed Becketts section, where the reigning World Champion had to ease off the accelerator much more significantly than the Ferrari drivers.

Ferrari F1 merchandise

Third sector: Ferrari shines in cornering, but errors prove costly

In the fast Stowe corner, Ferrari’s higher downforce once again worked in its favor. Charles Leclerc handled the section particularly well, achieving the highest minimum speed among the top drivers. As the lap entered the final sector, both Ferrari drivers managed to gain about one-tenth of a second thanks to superior braking and corner entry speed.

Unfortunately, both Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc made visible errors on corner exit—likely a consequence of having to run a stiffer suspension setup. These mistakes cost Hamilton 0.130 seconds and Leclerc 0.085 seconds.

Was pole really within reach for Ferrari?

Despite the less-than-ideal qualifying conditions, it seems clear that pole position was indeed within Ferrari’s grasp—providing either driver had managed to complete a flawless lap. The SF-25 demonstrated its strong potential throughout the weekend and particularly during the free practice sessions. However, unlike Max Verstappen, who maximized the performance of his car with surgical precision, both Ferrari drivers left precious lap time on the table at several key moments of their final attempts.

In this light, avoiding only the final error in the last sector would not have been sufficient on its own. Even so, the lower-downforce aerodynamic configuration chosen by Red Bull Racing proved to be a crucial factor in securing pole position. That same configuration, however, might become a liability during the race—especially if weather conditions turn wet or grip levels decrease.

Moreover, telemetry data compared with Oscar Piastri’s final lap shows that, at the time of the mistake in Turn 17—highlighted by an arrow in the trace—both Ferrari drivers were approximately two-tenths of a second ahead of the provisional second place. This suggests that, had they avoided the final sector error, Scuderia Ferrari would have likely secured second and third positions on the starting grid for the British Grand Prix.

Telemetry reveals how Ferrari lost pole position in Silverstone F1 qualifying | ScuderiaFans.com

Jul 5, 2025Sofia Bianchi
Click here to set ScuderiaFans.com as your preferred Google Discover source and find our content more easily!
Onboard analysis: how Ferrari threw away a front-row start in qualifying for British GPFerrari disappoints in Silverstone qualifying: Leo Turrini blames drivers, not the SF-25

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Sofia Bianchi

Sofia Bianchi is a ScuderiaFans editorial byline covering qualifying, races, championship developments and the latest Ferrari storylines. Her articles provide clear and engaging updates for Formula 1 fans.

1 year ago 2025 F1 British Grand Prix, News2025 Formula 1 season, British GP, Scuderia Ferrari, SF-25553
Next F1 race
0 Days
00 Hours
00 Mins
00 Secs
RACE DAY
until lights out
Gear up with Ferrari merchandise!
Buy official Ferrari 2026 F1 products
2026 Formula 1 calendar

Complete 2026 Formula 1 calendar with all Grand Prix dates and locations

Latest Ferrari technical analysis
Ferrari SF-26, suspension, brake discs, garage, 2026 F1, mechanics
Ferrari finds promising SF-26 improvements at Austin ahead of 2027 F1 development
23 hours ago
Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari SF-26, garage, 2026 F1, pitlane
Ferrari SF-26 Austin upgrades analysed: how much performance has the new package added?
1 day ago
Ferrari SF-26, suspension, garage, 2026 F1
Ferrari SF-26 Austin upgrades explained: four key aerodynamic changes for US GP
1 day ago
Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-26, 2026 F1
Ferrari’s United States GP SF-26 upgrades could provide key lessons for 2027
2 days ago
Ferrari SF-26, wet, 2026 F1
Ferrari SF-26 slow-corner weakness: how Austin upgrades could help
2 days ago

Latest articles

  • F1 United States GP tyre strategy: Pirelli reveals one-stop favourites and two-stop alternative
  • Ferrari is incredibly quick in corners, but Matteo Bobbi identifies one major problem
  • Roberto Chinchero sees Ferrari podium potential after Charles Leclerc’s Austin long run
  • Painkillers, dangerous bumps and a growing safety debate ahead of the United States GP
  • Why Ferrari’s race-focused SF-26 setup became a problem at the worst moment in Austin
Partners
Betwinner

non-GamStop casinos

best online casinos not on GamStop

bwacademy

magyarkaszinooldalak

GP-News - latest F1 news updates

The most accurate sports predictions and latest news available on TipsGG

1Win

no deposit casinos at GHZD Betpack Mostbet Pakistan australiacasinopokies top canadian casinos

Formula 1 News

Guitar Junky

Best Intraday Tips

Contact Center Company

SilverArrows.Net - Mercedes F1 news

TopSpeed

Esports Forum

Racing Statistics

Fixture Calendar

Live F1 Results

You can find reel-based games without download or registration via free slots on Slotozilla

Uusia Nettikasinoita
Thailand Walking Street

de bedste odds uden ROFUS på Leadership.ng

Get In Touch With Us

  • Advertise with ScuderiaFans
  • Contact us
  • Corrections Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Support ScuderiaFans.com

Meet the team

  • About us
  • Our writers
  • Formula 1 Circuits
  • 2026 Formula 1 Calendar
  • Formula 1 Statistics & Analysis
  • Ferrari F1 FAQ

© 2016–2026 Scuderia Fans Ltd. All rights reserved.

Scuderia Fans Ltd.
199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392
2016 © Scuderia Fans