Monegasque driver Charles Leclerc did not hide his disappointment after finishing fourth in qualifying at the Japanese Grand Prix, but it was not the position itself that frustrated him most—it was the way it came about. Small details can make all the difference, and the time lost, not only relative to rivals but also compared to his own benchmarks, highlights a situation in which the driver has limited control over how the lap unfolds.
Charles Leclerc remains one of the most transparent drivers when it comes to sharing his emotions and sensations after a qualifying session. Suzuka was no exception: the fourth-place finish was clearly reflected on his face and in his words, even after a Q3 lap he described as largely satisfying. The main source of frustration, however, came from the time lost on the straights, not only against competitors but also compared to his own internal references.
This issue has reappeared after races in Australia and China, where Ferrari again struggled in the decisive segment to fully manage the hybrid system, preventing the team from extracting the last few tenths of performance, as rivals do. Part of the problem stems from very restrictive regulations that demand extreme precision from drivers in both their driving style and the exact moment they apply the throttle.
Taking a corner more aggressively can alter the battery recharge phase and advance the moment when the driver can get back on the throttle. As counterintuitive as it may seem, this sometimes becomes a limitation because it means using the available 350 kW of electric power too early and finding yourself short of energy for the next straight. These dynamics are naturally frustrating for drivers, and their irritation is understandable whenever the plan doesn’t go as intended.
During his final Q3 attempt, Charles Leclerc also experienced a significant oversteer on exit from the Spoon curve. However, he was not overly concerned, believing that the higher cornering speed actually gained him time by pushing the car more aggressively. Data analysis confirmed that the speed through Spoon was similar to previous attempts, with the difference arising primarily in the exit phase.
Leclerc tried to anticipate the throttle return at that same point, gaining around 6 km/h compared to his previous lap. However, the oversteer forced him to slightly ease off the throttle, losing initial momentum. From that point, the acceleration curve changed, turning a potential advantage into a loss of up to 8 km/h in top speed.
The Power Unit appeared to provide more energy in the first part of the straight, to the point that at one stage the two runs nearly overlapped, differing by only 1 km/h. Beyond that, however, the gap widened again. On the second attempt, less energy seemed to be available until, in terms of pure top speed, the difference reached 5 km/h, which was then partially recovered after the 130R corner when only the internal combustion engine was contributing at peak power.
Charles Leclerc explained after qualifying: “It’s okay, I’m not too worried about that [oversteer]. I think a lot of people might believe I lost time with that oversteer, but in reality I gained a lot of time by carrying more speed through the corner. It was almost positive to have that oversteer! I don’t think it sacrificed anything from my lap after that incident; I pushed to the maximum. Overall, it was a good lap.” He then emphasized the time lost on the following straight, which he described as particularly frustrating.
“These Power Units are very sensitive in terms of energy management, and small details can make a big difference,” Leclerc continued. “Having a 350 kW electric motor with such a small battery actually drains a lot of energy, so there’s some need for flexibility from the software within the limits of the regulations to adapt to the situation.”
He added: “From our side, we struggle a bit in Q3 with system optimization. We lose some time on the straights, especially in sectors two and three. It’s very frustrating, because as a driver you can’t do much. But I know that the FIA is actively working on these issues, and hopefully we can find a solution soon in qualifying because it’s really frustrating.”
Charles Leclerc concluded: “It wasn’t perfect, but I’m very happy with the lap. I lost a lot of time on the straight compared to my own benchmarks, and that is truly frustrating. Even if you know it can happen when you get in the car, when it actually happens… you want to punch the steering wheel. It’s very frustrating. As a driver, we can do a lot in the car, but once you’re at 100% on the straight, there’s little you can do. I don’t know exactly what happened, but in Q3 I lost quite a bit of time from turn 14 to 16. Apart from that, it was a good lap. I had an incident at turn 8, but the 8/9 sequence was fine. I tried my best, it went reasonably well, but I’m a little disappointed to finish fourth.”
Looking ahead to the race, Leclerc Leclerc believes Ferrari has the pace to put pressure on McLaren, which has traditionally been stronger on single-lap performance where the Mercedes Power Unit shows its strengths, compared to the long run where the McLaren MCL40 shows some tyre management limitations, as seen previously in China.
Overtaking at Suzuka is notoriously difficult, so Leclerc intends to rely on the race start once again to try and surprise rivals. Regarding the battle with Mercedes, the feeling remains consistent with other circuits: as long as Ferrari can respond lap by lap, the SF-24 can compete with the W17. However, when tyre management comes into play, or when the two Mercedes cars find clean air, their pace is sufficient to create a gap.
Charles Leclerc summarized: “With a good start, we might be able to put them under pressure, but eventually they’ll pull away as they did in previous races. They have too much pace advantage. But if we can extend the battle to the final lap, then maybe we’d have a chance at victory. As soon as they have a lap in clean air, it will be impossible for us to overtake again.”
Charles Leclerc’s P4 at Suzuka is a result of a driver pushing a chassis to its absolute limit while being let down by the invisible constraints of energy deployment. Based on the content of his post-session analysis, Sunday’s race will be a tactical game of track position and tire preservation as he tries to break the Mercedes stranglehold.
Leave a Reply