Scuderia Fans

  • News
  • Current Drivers
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Lewis Hamilton
  • Races
    • 2026 F1 Hungarian Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Dutch Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Italian Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Spanish Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Azerbaijan Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Bahrain Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 Singapore Grand Prix
    • 2026 F1 United States Grand Prix
  • Formula 1 Statistics
  • Ferrari F1 World Champions
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Kimi Raikkonen
    • Niki Lauda
    • Jody Scheckter
    • John Surtees
    • Phil Hill
    • Mike Hawthorn
    • Juan-Manuel Fangio
    • Alberto Ascari
  • Former Ferrari drivers
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Felipe Massa
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Gilles Villeneuve
    • Jean Alesi
    • Alain Prost
    • Nigel Mansell
    • Gerhard Berger
    • Mario Andretti
    • Rubens Barrichello
    • Michele Alboreto
    • Patrick Tambay
    • Eddie Irvine
    • Rene Arnoux
    • Didier Pironi
    • Jacky Ickx
    • Carlos Reutemann
    • Clay Regazzoni
    • Stefan Johansson
    • Arturo Merzario
    • Giancarlo Fisichella
    • Carlos Sainz
  • Ferrari WEC
  • F1 TICKETS
  • Advertise with ScuderiaFans
  • Ferrari F1 Shop
  • Home
  • Formula 1 Schedule & Results
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
  • Contact us
Home » Belgian GP 2025: was the start delay justified or overcautious?

Belgian GP 2025: was the start delay justified or overcautious?. The 2025 Belgian Grand Prix reignited debate over wet-weather racing.

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-25, intermediates, 2025 F1

The paddock at the Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps was divided during the 2025 Belgian Grand Prix, with some teams and drivers — those who opted for a wet-weather setup — hoping for a 3:00 PM start as scheduled, while others with a dry configuration preferred a delayed restart. The race direction eventually chose to delay the start significantly, sparking debate over whether the wait was excessive, especially considering that only seven racing laps were ultimately run on intermediate tyres. Reigning World Champion Max Verstappen summed up the frustration by saying, “It seems like no one wants to race in the rain anymore.”

It felt like a scripted twist. After relentless rainfall through the morning hours, the skies above Spa began to clear shortly after 1:00 PM. One hour before the planned start, it appeared that the Grand Prix might be held under mostly dry conditions. But just as the Formula 1 cars reached the grid after the pre-formation laps, dark clouds returned, and soon a heavy downpour hit the circuit once again. Despite the worsening weather, race officials initially went ahead with the 3:00 PM start, sending the cars out behind the safety car. However, after just one lap, the red flag was shown and the race was suspended.

The majority of drivers had already expressed their concerns over the radio, complaining of near-zero visibility. Helmet-cam footage confirmed the issue — the track was engulfed in a thick mist of spray, making conditions nearly impossible for those starting in the second half of the grid. In this collective problem, the differing strategies became apparent. Teams that had committed to a full wet setup before qualifying — like Red Bull Racing — pushed for a prompt start, with Max Verstappen leading the charge for those ready to take on the elements.

While the decision to suspend the start was widely considered the correct one, it was the subsequent long delay — lasting an hour and twenty minutes — that drew heavy criticism. The race eventually restarted behind the safety car, which remained on track for four full laps before releasing the field.

Add ScuderiaFans.com as your preferred Google News source for Formula 1 updates

Race control appeared to rely more heavily on radar data predicting further rainfall than on real-time track conditions. In the end, once the cars were finally racing on intermediate tyres, only seven laps were completed before drivers including Lewis Hamilton, Pierre Gasly, Nico Hülkenberg, and Fernando Alonso switched to slick tyres. This demonstrated that the race could likely have resumed at least 30 minutes earlier.

At the end of the Grand Prix, reactions across the Formula 1 paddock were mixed. Red Bull advisor Helmut Marko stated, “The race could have started at 3:00 PM. After three or four laps behind the safety car, a dry line would have formed and spray would no longer have been a major issue. Race control was too cautious.”

Max Verstappen echoed that sentiment, adding: “We need to decide whether we still race in the rain or not. We could have started an hour earlier. The decision made today essentially took away the chance to have a proper wet race. There needs to be clarity, because today it felt like we were forced to wait until the track was dry.”

Ferrari F1 merchandise

In contrast, team principals from the two teams that reached the podium defended the FIA’s cautious approach. Andrea Stella, Team Principal of McLaren, explained: “Race control handled the situation with wisdom. At a track like Spa, it is always better to proceed with caution. The lack of visibility, especially in high-speed sections like Eau Rouge and Raidillon, makes the track extremely dangerous.”

Ferrari Team Principal Frédéric Vasseur shared this view, highlighting how onboard helmet camera footage clearly showed just how poor the visibility conditions really were. He stressed that this footage helped justify the decision to delay the start.

However, there is an important distinction to be made between the justified decision to delay the initial 3:00 PM start and the excessively long wait before restarting the race. For drivers sitting in the garages, watching the track dry up and the opportunity to compete in wet conditions fade away, frustration was understandable.

The FIA operated under a “zero-risk” policy, choosing to send the cars back out only when the skies above Spa-Francorchamps had fully cleared and the sun began to shine. While it would have been dangerous to start the race at the original scheduled time, many felt that waiting so long undermined the challenge and spectacle of racing in the wet. Ultimately, the use of intermediate tyres was limited to just seven laps of real racing.

In making his point, Max Verstappen posed a question that still hangs in the air: under the FIA’s current guidelines, is it still possible to hold a proper wet-weather Grand Prix? Technically, the answer is yes — but the window of acceptable conditions has become extremely narrow. It starts only when visibility is deemed acceptable and ends as soon as slick tyres become viable. At the 2025 Belgian Grand Prix, that window lasted just seven laps.

Jul 28, 2025David Carter
Click here to set ScuderiaFans.com as your preferred Google Discover source and find our content more easily!
Belgian GP under fire: safety, delays, and tyre controversy spark debate in F1Ferrari’s technical step forward at Spa: setup, tyre strategy, and driver execution

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

David Carter

David Carter is a ScuderiaFans editorial byline for race-weekend analysis, strategy and Ferrari performance. His coverage examines the decisions and developments that shape each Grand Prix.

1 year ago 2025 F1 Belgian Grand Prix, News2025 Formula 1 season, Belgian GP39
Next F1 race
0 Days
00 Hours
00 Mins
00 Secs
RACE DAY
until lights out
Gear up with Ferrari merchandise!
Buy official Ferrari 2026 F1 products
2026 Formula 1 calendar

Complete 2026 Formula 1 calendar with all Grand Prix dates and locations

Latest Ferrari technical analysis
Charles Leclerc, Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari 2026 F1
Ferrari’s USA GP Q3 setback explained: how changing wind exposed the SF-26’s new balance
18 hours ago
Ferrari SF-26, suspension, brake discs, garage, 2026 F1, mechanics
Ferrari finds promising SF-26 improvements at Austin ahead of 2027 F1 development
1 day ago
Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari SF-26, garage, 2026 F1, pitlane
Ferrari SF-26 Austin upgrades analysed: how much performance has the new package added?
1 day ago
Ferrari SF-26, suspension, garage, 2026 F1
Ferrari SF-26 Austin upgrades explained: four key aerodynamic changes for US GP
2 days ago
Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-26, 2026 F1
Ferrari’s United States GP SF-26 upgrades could provide key lessons for 2027
2 days ago

Latest articles

  • Fred Vasseur warns Ferrari faces major cooling and grip challenge at 2026 Mexico GP
  • 2026 F1 Mexico City GP schedule: practice, qualifying, race start time and TV coverage
  • Ferrari’s Austin resurgence: why Charles Leclerc was the other winner despite missing victory
  • Ferrari had the pace to win in Austin: why qualifying proved costly against Mercedes
  • Charles Leclerc reveals Ferrari progress is unlocking his 2026 F1 form after Austin P2
Partners
Betwinner

non-GamStop casinos

best online casinos not on GamStop

bwacademy

magyarkaszinooldalak

GP-News - latest F1 news updates

The most accurate sports predictions and latest news available on TipsGG

1Win

no deposit casinos at GHZD Betpack Mostbet Pakistan australiacasinopokies top canadian casinos

Formula 1 News

Guitar Junky

Best Intraday Tips

Contact Center Company

SilverArrows.Net - Mercedes F1 news

TopSpeed

Esports Forum

Racing Statistics

Fixture Calendar

Live F1 Results

You can find reel-based games without download or registration via free slots on Slotozilla

Uusia Nettikasinoita
Thailand Walking Street

de bedste odds uden ROFUS på Leadership.ng

Get In Touch With Us

  • Advertise with ScuderiaFans
  • Contact us
  • Corrections Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Support ScuderiaFans.com

Meet the team

  • About us
  • Our writers
  • Formula 1 Circuits
  • 2026 Formula 1 Calendar
  • Formula 1 Statistics & Analysis
  • Ferrari F1 FAQ

© 2016–2026 Scuderia Fans Ltd. All rights reserved.

Scuderia Fans Ltd.
199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392
2016 © Scuderia Fans